From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755002AbcA0XDx (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:03:53 -0500 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]:52313 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754440AbcA0XDu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:03:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:03:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Andrew Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api , Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Dave Watson , Chris Lameter , Ingo Molnar , Ben Maurer , rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk Message-ID: <1521030890.6359.1453935819051.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <1011987684.6168.1453920399905.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <1453913683-28915-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1453913683-28915-3-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20160127181915.GA10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1011987684.6168.1453920399905.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] getcpu_cache: wire up ARM system call MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [78.47.125.74] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1178 (ZimbraWebClient - FF43 (Linux)/8.6.0_GA_1178) Thread-Topic: getcpu_cache: wire up ARM system call Thread-Index: o3jW3mSusTt0seO8jEubgDtPKyWo6ETetG6w Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote: > ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:54:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>> Wire up the getcpu cache system call on 32-bit ARM. Call the >> >> You should note that your chosen system call number of 391 is temporary >> here and can't be relied upon as we have to wire up the new >> copy_file_range() call on ARM (which I've just committed the patch for.) >> >> I'd much prefer the wiring up to be either an entirely separate patch >> (which must be submitted to me, and I'll merge between -rc1 and -rc2 >> along with any other syscall updates) or you leave the wiring up to me. >> >> This is so that I can ensure that (a) system calls numbers are not >> duplicated and (b) ensure that we follow the same logical order as x86 >> where possible. > > Just to make sure I understand: you would prefer if I split this > patch into two: one that adds the getcpu_cache_handle_notify_resume() > call in the resume notifier ("getcpu_cache ARM architecture support"), > and a separate patch for wiring up the system call ? I just refactored my patchset as described above (for upcoming v3). Just to make sure there is no confusion, I target Linux 4.6 for this patchset, since the 4.5 merge window is closed. Thanks, Mathieu > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up >> according to speedtest.net. > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com