From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: Support gadget mode when the port is set to dual role
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522324644.1746.19.camel@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180329092326.dayuccomq5zrywqo@flea>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2723 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 11:23 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:52:13PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > This allows dual-role ports to be reported as having gadget mode by
> > the
> > musb_has_gadget helper. This is required to enable MUSB at all with
> > MUSB
> > glue layers that set the port mode to MUSB_PORT_MODE_DUAL_ROLE at
> > init.
> >
> > Most notably, this allows calling musb_start when needed in the
> > virtual
> > MUSB root HUB, regardless of whether the current mode should be
> > gadget
> > or host.
> >
> > This fixes USB OTG on Allwinner devices that I could test it with,
> > mainly A20 devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
>
> Surely there's more to it than that. The gadget mode of A20 boards
> have been working in the past, including when compiling with mUSB
> setup as dual role.
>
> Is this a regression since a particular commit? Or is there another,
> deeper issue overlooked in the commit log?
The root of the issue here is that musb_start is not called at any point
without this patch. My understanding of the flow is the following: when
the PHY detects that there was a VBUS/ID change, it will notify its
listeners (mainly the musb sunxi glue layer). This will then schedule
the driver's work (sunxi_musb_work), which does nothing since the
SUNXI_MUSB_FL_ENABLED bit was never set. This bit is only set after
calling sunxi_musb_enable, which is called from musb_platform_enable,
that originates from musb_start.
Currently I see two places where musb_start is called:
* musb_virthub
* musb_gadget
In the latter case, it is in turn called from udc_start, which should
probably (correct me if I'm wrong) happen later in the call chain than
ID/VBUS change notification time.
In the former case, musb_start is called in the root controller hub
control, when setting the USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER feature. This looks
perfectly legit and IMO this is where it should be initially calling
musb_start in the dual role case. The kernel is indeed setting the
feature, only that it fails to enable musb without this patch.
First, I'd like to make sure that this understanding of the flow is
correct as I may have missed something here. Does it make sense?
Then, it seems that the offending commit is: be9d39881fc4f
("usb: musb: host: rely on port_mode to call musb_start()")
That itself fixed: ae44df2e21b5
("usb: musb: call musb_start() only once in OTG mode")
Still, this commit was authored in June 2015, so almost 3 years ago.
In the meantime, the sunxi driver has received feature improvements, so
it seems hard to believe that it was broken all this time...
Cheers,
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-29 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-28 21:52 [PATCH] usb: musb: Support gadget mode when the port is set to dual role Paul Kocialkowski
2018-03-29 9:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-03-29 11:57 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2018-04-03 9:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-21 10:51 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2018-04-20 14:25 ` Bin Liu
2018-04-21 10:59 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2018-04-21 14:34 ` Bin Liu
2018-04-30 21:08 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2018-05-01 12:25 ` Bin Liu
2018-05-01 13:26 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2018-05-01 16:22 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-21 10:02 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-21 13:01 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-21 16:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-03-22 12:46 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-22 13:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-22 13:28 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-22 13:34 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-03-22 13:44 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-22 13:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-22 14:04 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-22 13:10 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-03-22 13:36 ` Bin Liu
2019-03-22 13:37 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-03-22 13:46 ` Bin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522324644.1746.19.camel@bootlin.com \
--to=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
--cc=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=contact@paulk.fr \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox