From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752074AbeDXQrJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:47:09 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:1502 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751513AbeDXQrF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:47:05 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,323,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="53290221" Message-ID: <1524588420.21176.505.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer specifiers From: Andy Shevchenko To: Petr Mladek Cc: Linus Torvalds , Rasmus Villemoes , "Tobin C . Harding" , Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:47:00 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20180411095218.zth5edjth2cxrrwc@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20180404085843.16050-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20180404085843.16050-5-pmladek@suse.com> <1523111200.21176.416.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180409135028.ymyvsqxup7zm5vgc@pathway.suse.cz> <1523360515.21176.434.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180411095218.zth5edjth2cxrrwc@pathway.suse.cz> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.5-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 11:52 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2018-04-10 14:41:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > On Sat 2018-04-07 17:26:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > I think about 1-7 and 9 that can go as is before your changes. > > And patch 8 postpone > > Done. All the 8 patches are in printk.git, branch > for-4.18-vsprintf-cleanup. Thanks! > I am sorry that we have missed 4.17. In theory, it still might be > possible to push them there. But there does not seem to be a real > reason to rush them. Agree. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy