From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
agustinv@codeaurora.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:20:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524594014-79243-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524594014-79243-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Perf stat doesn't count the uncore event aliases from the same uncore
block in a group, for example:
perf stat -e '{unc_m_cas_count.all,unc_m_clockticks}' -a -I 1000
# time counts unit events
1.000447342 <not counted> unc_m_cas_count.all
1.000447342 <not counted> unc_m_clockticks
2.000740654 <not counted> unc_m_cas_count.all
2.000740654 <not counted> unc_m_clockticks
The output is very misleading. It gives a wrong impression that the
uncore event doesn't work.
An uncore block could be composed by several PMUs. An uncore event alias
is a joint name which means the same event runs on all PMUs of a block.
Perf doesn't support mixed events from different PMUs in the same group.
It is wrong to put uncore event aliases in a big group.
The right way is to split the big group into multiple small groups which
only include the events from the same PMU.
Only uncore event aliases from the same uncore block should be specially
handled here. It doesn't make sense to mix the uncore events with other
uncore events from different blocks or even core events in a group.
With the patch:
# time counts unit events
1.001557653 140,833 unc_m_cas_count.all
1.001557653 1,330,231,332 unc_m_clockticks
2.002709483 85,007 unc_m_cas_count.all
2.002709483 1,429,494,563 unc_m_clockticks
Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 7 +++-
tools/perf/util/parse-events.y | 8 ++--
4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index d3ee3af..b8a1055 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct perf_evsel {
bool precise_max;
bool ignore_missing_thread;
bool forced_leader;
+ bool use_uncore_alias;
/* parse modifier helper */
int exclude_GH;
int nr_members;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 2fb0272..7a836fe 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1219,13 +1219,16 @@ int parse_events_add_numeric(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
struct list_head *list, char *name,
- struct list_head *head_config, bool auto_merge_stats)
+ struct list_head *head_config,
+ bool auto_merge_stats,
+ bool use_alias)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr;
struct perf_pmu_info info;
struct perf_pmu *pmu;
struct perf_evsel *evsel;
struct parse_events_error *err = parse_state->error;
+ bool use_uncore_alias;
LIST_HEAD(config_terms);
pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
@@ -1244,11 +1247,14 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
}
+ use_uncore_alias = (pmu->is_uncore && use_alias);
+
if (!head_config) {
attr.type = pmu->type;
evsel = __add_event(list, &parse_state->idx, &attr, NULL, pmu, NULL, auto_merge_stats);
if (evsel) {
evsel->pmu_name = name;
+ evsel->use_uncore_alias = use_uncore_alias;
return 0;
} else {
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1282,6 +1288,7 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
evsel->metric_expr = info.metric_expr;
evsel->metric_name = info.metric_name;
evsel->pmu_name = name;
+ evsel->use_uncore_alias = use_uncore_alias;
}
return evsel ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
@@ -1317,7 +1324,7 @@ int parse_events_multi_pmu_add(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
list_add_tail(&term->list, head);
if (!parse_events_add_pmu(parse_state, list,
- pmu->name, head, true)) {
+ pmu->name, head, true, true)) {
pr_debug("%s -> %s/%s/\n", str,
pmu->name, alias->str);
ok++;
@@ -1339,7 +1346,85 @@ int parse_events__modifier_group(struct list_head *list,
return parse_events__modifier_event(list, event_mod, true);
}
-void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
+/*
+ * Check if the two uncore PMUs are from the same uncore block
+ * The format of the uncore PMU name is uncore_#blockname_#pmuidx
+ */
+static bool is_same_uncore_block(const char *pmu_name_a, const char *pmu_name_b)
+{
+ char *end_a, *end_b;
+
+ end_a = strrchr(pmu_name_a, '_');
+ end_b = strrchr(pmu_name_b, '_');
+
+ if (!end_a || !end_b)
+ return false;
+
+ if ((end_a - pmu_name_a) != (end_b - pmu_name_b))
+ return false;
+
+ return (0 == strncmp(pmu_name_a, pmu_name_b, end_a - pmu_name_a));
+}
+
+static int
+parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
+{
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel, *leader;
+ uintptr_t *leaders;
+ int i = 0, nr_pmu = 0, total_members, ret = 0;
+
+ leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
+ evsel = list_entry(list->prev, struct perf_evsel, node);
+ total_members = evsel->idx - leader->idx + 1;
+
+ leaders = calloc(total_members, sizeof(uintptr_t));
+ if (!leaders)
+ return ret;
+
+ __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
+
+ /* Only split the uncore group which members use alias */
+ if (!evsel->use_uncore_alias)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* The events must be from the same uncore block */
+ if (!is_same_uncore_block(leader->pmu_name, evsel->pmu_name))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!strcmp(leader->name, evsel->name))
+ leaders[nr_pmu++] = (uintptr_t) evsel;
+ }
+
+ /* only one event alias */
+ if (nr_pmu == total_members) {
+ parse_state->nr_groups--;
+ goto handled;
+ }
+
+ __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
+ if (i >= nr_pmu)
+ i = 0;
+ evsel->leader = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i++];
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
+ evsel = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i];
+ evsel->nr_members = total_members / nr_pmu;
+ evsel->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
+ }
+
+ parse_state->nr_groups += nr_pmu - 1;
+
+handled:
+ ret = 1;
+out:
+ free(leaders);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
{
struct perf_evsel *leader;
@@ -1348,6 +1433,9 @@ void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
return;
}
+ if (parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(name, list, parse_state))
+ return;
+
__perf_evlist__set_leader(list);
leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
leader->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
index 5015cfd..4473dac 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
@@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ int parse_events_add_breakpoint(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
void *ptr, char *type, u64 len);
int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
struct list_head *list, char *name,
- struct list_head *head_config, bool auto_merge_stats);
+ struct list_head *head_config,
+ bool auto_merge_stats,
+ bool use_alias);
int parse_events_multi_pmu_add(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
char *str,
@@ -178,7 +180,8 @@ int parse_events_copy_term_list(struct list_head *old,
enum perf_pmu_event_symbol_type
perf_pmu__parse_check(const char *name);
-void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list);
+void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state);
void parse_events_update_lists(struct list_head *list_event,
struct list_head *list_all);
void parse_events_evlist_error(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
index 7afeb80..e37608a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ PE_NAME '{' events '}'
struct list_head *list = $3;
inc_group_count(list, _parse_state);
- parse_events__set_leader($1, list);
+ parse_events__set_leader($1, list, _parse_state);
$$ = list;
}
|
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ PE_NAME '{' events '}'
struct list_head *list = $2;
inc_group_count(list, _parse_state);
- parse_events__set_leader(NULL, list);
+ parse_events__set_leader(NULL, list, _parse_state);
$$ = list;
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config
YYABORT;
ALLOC_LIST(list);
- if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2, false)) {
+ if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2, false, false)) {
struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
int ok = 0;
char *pattern;
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config
free(pattern);
YYABORT;
}
- if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms, true))
+ if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms, true, false))
ok++;
parse_events_terms__delete(terms);
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 18:20 [PATCH 1/5] perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform kan.liang
2018-04-24 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf stat: Print out hint for mixed PMU group error kan.liang
2018-04-26 5:56 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-04-24 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf evsel: Only fall back group read for leader kan.liang
2018-04-26 5:57 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-04-24 18:20 ` kan.liang [this message]
2018-04-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-24 19:23 ` Liang, Kan
2018-04-24 19:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 12:27 ` Liang, Kan
2018-04-25 12:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 13:39 ` Liang, Kan
2018-04-24 18:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf stat: Fix duplicate PMU name for interval print kan.liang
2018-04-24 18:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-24 19:18 ` Liang, Kan
2018-04-24 19:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-26 5:57 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-04-26 5:56 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524594014-79243-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=agustinv@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox