From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752044AbeEPPq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 11:46:28 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:33242 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbeEPPqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 11:46:25 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,406,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="229031108" Message-ID: <1526485584.61700.19.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for SKX From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@suse.de, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mgorman@techsingularity.net, x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:46:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180516074948.GZ12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180516044911.28797-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20180516044911.28797-11-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20180516074948.GZ12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 (3.24.6-1.fc26) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:49:11PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > Enable HWP boost on Skylake server platform. > > Why not unconditionally enable it on everything HWP ? Never noticed in any difference performance in clients with HWP nor anybody complained. Since clients uses single power domain, some other CPUs always gives boost. Thanks, Srinivas