From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
bp@suse.de, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, x86@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq / sched: Add interface to get utilization values
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:25:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526509557.61700.95.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516064055.gbmemcxsv2qvx67g@vireshk-i7>
On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 12:10 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-05-18, 21:49, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > Added cpufreq_get_sched_util() to get the CFS, DL and max
> > utilization
> > values for a CPU. This is required for getting utilization values
> > for cpufreq drivers outside of kernel/sched folder.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel
> > .com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
> > b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
> > index 5966744..a366600 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ void cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(int cpu, struct
> > update_util_data *data,
> > void (*func)(struct update_util_data *data,
> > u64 time,
> > unsigned int flags));
> > void cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(int cpu);
> > +void cpufreq_get_sched_util(int cpu, unsigned long *util_cfs,
> > + unsigned long *util_dl, unsigned long
> > *max);
> > #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
> >
> > #endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_CPUFREQ_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq.c
> > index 5e54cbc..36e2839 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -60,3 +60,26 @@ void cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(int cpu)
> > rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu),
> > NULL);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * cpufreq_get_sched_util - Get utilization values.
> > + * @cpu: The targeted CPU.
> > + *
> > + * Get the CFS, DL and max utilization.
> > + * This function allows cpufreq driver outside the kernel/sched to
> > access
> > + * utilization value for a CPUs run queue.
> > + */
> > +void cpufreq_get_sched_util(int cpu, unsigned long *util_cfs,
> > + unsigned long *util_dl, unsigned long
> > *max)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>
> What will happen when schedutil is compiled in the kernel but
> ondemand
> is the one getting used currently ?
It should still work. The only reason I have to use ifdef because of
compile issues when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_SCHEDUTIL is not defined.
The reason for that is that cpu_util_cfs() and cpu_util_dl() is defined
under #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL.
The actual code inside the cpu_util_cfs() and cpu_util_dl() uses
rq->cfs.avg.util_avg and rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, which are updated
irrespective of cpufreq governor. May be better to remove ifdefs for
cpu_util_dl() and cpu_util_cfs().
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> > + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +
> > + *max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
> > + *util_cfs = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
> > + *util_dl = cpu_util_dl(rq);
> > +#else
> > + *util_cfs = *util_dl = 1;
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_get_sched_util);
> > --
> > 2.9.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 4:49 [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 01/10] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Conditional frequency invariant accounting Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 7:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 9:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 17:32 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:19 ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 16:31 ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 10:59 ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:04 ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:41 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17 16:42 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-17 18:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 7:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-18 10:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 13:33 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-30 16:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 14:09 ` Valentin Schneider
2018-05-16 15:58 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility functions to boost HWP performance limits Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 9:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:39 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:41 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util_hook for HWP Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on IO Wake Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 17:55 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 9:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 19:28 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq / sched: Add interface to get utilization values Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 6:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-16 22:25 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2018-05-16 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 22:40 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on busy task migrate Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 20:59 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Dyanmically update busy pct Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: New sysfs entry to control HWP boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for SKX Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:46 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17 0:52 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 6:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:43 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1526509557.61700.95.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox