Re: [PATCH V6] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle injection framework

["Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1734 bytes --]

On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 22:00 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 13/06/2018 17:54, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 14:00 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Initially, the cpu_cooling device for ARM was changed by adding a
> > > new
> > > policy inserting idle cycles. The intel_powerclamp driver does a
> > > similar action.
> > > 
> > > Instead of implementing idle injections privately in the
> > > cpu_cooling
> > > device, move the idle injection code in a dedicated framework and
> > > give
> > > the opportunity to other frameworks to make use of it.
> > > 
> > > The framework relies on the smpboot kthreads which handles via
> > > its
> > > main loop the common code for hotplugging and [un]parking.
> > > 
> > > This code was previously tested with the cpu cooling device and
> > > went
> > > through several iterations. It results now in split code and API
> > > exported in the header file. It was tested with the cpu cooling
> > > device
> > > with success.
> > > 
> > 
> > May be I have missed, but I don't see any use of powercap sysfs.
> > 
> > We created powercap sys that user space is presented a common
> > interface
> > for power capping. The RAPL driver was also submitted as cooling
> > device
> > before, but suggestion was to create this powercap.
> > 
> > So if powercap interface is not enough then may be we should
> > enhance
> > that.
> 
> We are creating a framework for idle injection. This framework can
> then
> be used by the cpu_cooling device, the power_clamp and in addition a
> power capping for ARM (if it makes sense).
But in this case, why in drivers/powercap folder as this is another
framework?

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3290 bytes --]