public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova()
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:10:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530886247.3205.53.camel@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180706131611.h3w2kdinmjguikgo@8bytes.org>

On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 15:16 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:08:20PM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > find_iova() looks to be using a bad locking practice: it locks the
> > returned iova only for the search time.  And looking in code, the
> > element can be removed from the tree and freed under rbtree lock.
> > That
> > happens during memory hot-unplug and cleanup on module
> > removal.  Here
> > I cleanup users of the function and delete it.
> 
> But this is only a problem if more than one code-path uses tries to
> handle a given iova at the same time, no?

Yes, as far as I can see, there are code-paths which may try to handle
it at the same time:
o memory notifiers for hot-unplug (intel-iommu.c)
o drivers unloading calls free_iova(), which in the result calls
  find_iova()
o I see at least one driver that frees iova during it's normal work
  too: scif_rma.c:scif_free_window_offset()

So, I decided to fix the interface while it's not widely used instead
of all callers.
Looks worth for me even as it's all corner-cases like unplugging the
memory.

Anyway, just found it while some college wrote a debug sysfs interface
for iovas and used find_iova().
So, if you think it's not worth to change - that's fine for me, but I
thought I'll nip this in the bud, preventing other people to misuse it.

-- 
Thanks,
             Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 18:08 [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 1/3] iommu/iova: Find and split iova under rbtree's lock Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 2/3] iommu/iova: Make free_iova() atomic Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 3/3] iommu/iova: Remove find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-07-03 18:59 ` [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-07-06 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-06 14:10   ` Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2018-07-06 15:13     ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-09 17:57       ` Dmitry Safonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1530886247.3205.53.camel@arista.com \
    --to=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox