From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova()
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:10:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530886247.3205.53.camel@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180706131611.h3w2kdinmjguikgo@8bytes.org>
On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 15:16 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:08:20PM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > find_iova() looks to be using a bad locking practice: it locks the
> > returned iova only for the search time. And looking in code, the
> > element can be removed from the tree and freed under rbtree lock.
> > That
> > happens during memory hot-unplug and cleanup on module
> > removal. Here
> > I cleanup users of the function and delete it.
>
> But this is only a problem if more than one code-path uses tries to
> handle a given iova at the same time, no?
Yes, as far as I can see, there are code-paths which may try to handle
it at the same time:
o memory notifiers for hot-unplug (intel-iommu.c)
o drivers unloading calls free_iova(), which in the result calls
find_iova()
o I see at least one driver that frees iova during it's normal work
too: scif_rma.c:scif_free_window_offset()
So, I decided to fix the interface while it's not widely used instead
of all callers.
Looks worth for me even as it's all corner-cases like unplugging the
memory.
Anyway, just found it while some college wrote a debug sysfs interface
for iovas and used find_iova().
So, if you think it's not worth to change - that's fine for me, but I
thought I'll nip this in the bud, preventing other people to misuse it.
--
Thanks,
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 18:08 [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 1/3] iommu/iova: Find and split iova under rbtree's lock Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 2/3] iommu/iova: Make free_iova() atomic Dmitry Safonov
2018-06-21 18:08 ` [RFC 3/3] iommu/iova: Remove find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-07-03 18:59 ` [RFC 0/3] iommu/iova: Unsafe locking in find_iova() Dmitry Safonov
2018-07-06 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-06 14:10 ` Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2018-07-06 15:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-09 17:57 ` Dmitry Safonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530886247.3205.53.camel@arista.com \
--to=dima@arista.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox