From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
sunil.k.pandey@intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf evlist: Fix error out while applying initial delay and LBR
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 07:15:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531145722-16404-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Perf record will error out if both --delay and LBR are applied.
For example:
perf record -D 1000 -a -e cycles -j any -- sleep 2
Error:
dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts.
Try 'perf stat'
A dummy event is added implicitly for initial delay, which has the same
configurations as real sampling events. The dummy event is a software
event. If LBR is configured, perf must error out.
The dummy event only be used to track PERF_RECORD_MMAP while perf waits
for the initial delay to enable the real events. The BRANCH_STACK bit
can be safely cleared for the dummy event.
After applying the patch:
perf record -D 1000 -a -e cycles -j any -- sleep 2
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.054 MB perf.data (828 samples) ]
Reported-by: Pandey, Sunil K <sunil.k.pandey@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 94fce4f..0d55047 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
}
}
+static bool is_dummy_event(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
+{
+ return (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE) &&
+ (evsel->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY);
+}
+
/*
* The enable_on_exec/disabled value strategy:
*
@@ -1086,6 +1092,14 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
else
perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
}
+
+ /*
+ * For initial_delay, a dummy event is added implicitly.
+ * The software event will trigger -EOPNOTSUPP error out,
+ * if BRANCH_STACK bit is set.
+ */
+ if (opts->initial_delay && is_dummy_event(evsel))
+ perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
}
static int perf_evsel__alloc_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 14:15 kan.liang [this message]
2018-07-09 15:20 ` [PATCH] perf evlist: Fix error out while applying initial delay and LBR Jiri Olsa
2018-07-26 12:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-08-02 8:07 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531145722-16404-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sunil.k.pandey@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox