From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756641Ab2BNPWx (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:22:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27762 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751329Ab2BNPWv (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:22:51 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <4F3A785A.4030500@de.ibm.com> References: <4F3A785A.4030500@de.ibm.com> <20120214145022.12531.16731.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan@danny.cz, Carsten Otte , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Enable the compat keyctl wrapper on s390x Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:22:38 +0000 Message-ID: <15313.1329232958@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Do you want to push this change via Martins s390 tree or via other > trees? I've no objection to it going via Martin's tree. It's really an S390 fix rather than a keyrings/security fix. David