public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	"Simon Horman [Horms]" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: sh_cmt: 32-bit control register support
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:35:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531456.g1EpKAjrma@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoSnBfr5sfSiYayKCmyw0EpY4+kq7pnQ1BJQt6wagTe8eQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Magnus,

On Tuesday 18 June 2013 14:39:38 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 17 June 2013 15:40:52 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> 
> >> Add support for CMT hardware with 32-bit control and counter
> >> registers, as found on r8a73a4 and r8a7790. To use the CMT
> >> with 32-bit hardware a second I/O memory resource needs to
> >> point out the CMSTR register and it needs to be 32 bit wide.
> > 
> > Is a memory second resource required ? Can't we use a single resource that
> > will contain all the registers ?
> 
> The CMT hardware block comes with a shared timer start stop register
> that historically has been left out of the resource. The location of
> this register has so far been pointed out by the "channel offset"
> platform data member, together with information about which bit that
> happens to be assigned to the timer channel. This start stop register
> has happened to be kept in the same page of I/O memory as the main
> timer channel resource, so at this point we're sort of "lucky" that a
> single ioremap() has covered all cases.
> 
> With this patch it becomes optional to instead of platform data use a
> second resource to point out the timer start/stop register. While we
> do that we can also use the size of that resource to determine the I/O
> access width, which happens to be something that is needed to enable
> the driver on certain SoCs.

OK, I get it now. I've had a quick look at the documentation, and I'm 
wondering whether we shouldn't register a single platform device that span all 
the channels contained in the CMT, instead of registering one platform device 
per channel.

> > Time to switch to devm_* managed functions ? :-)
> 
> Yes, indeed. That among other things, like converting the driver to in
> a more optimal way support clock source only or clock event only
> configurations. Also, some more modern CMT hardware versions have
> extended registers with 48-bit counters, and we can also often use
> more high frequency clocks to improve timer resolution.
> 
> As you can tell, in general there are many things that can be improved
> with this driver. I thought a first shot could be to make it actually
> work on more recent CMT hardware with 32-bit only registers. So that's
> what this patch does!

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17  6:40 [PATCH] clocksource: sh_cmt: 32-bit control register support Magnus Damm
2013-06-17 18:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-18  5:39   ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-18 10:35     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-06-18 11:54       ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-18 12:30         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-18 13:27           ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-19 12:31             ` Simon Horman
2013-06-19 12:58               ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-20 12:30                 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1531456.g1EpKAjrma@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox