From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: usb: uvc: use vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish helper
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:11:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532665.63kW7uD9fo@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8sAUDo+ut1t2_twy6hNjX5WQpridCEm6NrNmrwQvR1Nrw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Prabhakar,
On Friday 28 November 2014 17:06:52 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Prabhakar,
>
> [Snip]
>
> >> + queue->queue.lock = &queue->mutex;
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned that this would introduce future breakages. Setting
> > the queue.lock pointer enables locking in all vb2_fop_* and vb2_ops_wait_*
> > functions. The uvcvideo driver isn't ready for that, but doesn't use the
> > vb2_fop_* functions yet, so that's not an issue. However, in the future,
> > videobuf2 might use the lock in more places, including functions used by
> > the uvcvideo driver. This could then cause breakages.
>
> Even if in future if videobuf2 uses this lock it would be in helpers mostly,
> so any way it doesn’t harm :)
My concern is about vb2 starting using the lock in existing helpers used by
the uvcvideo driver. I suppose we can deal with it later.
> > It would be better to completely convert the uvcvideo driver to the
> > vb2_fop_* functions if we want to use vb2_ops_*. I'm not sure how complex
> > that would be though, and whether it would be possible while still
> > keeping the fine-grained locking implemented by the uvcvideo driver. Do
> > you think it should be attempted ?
>
> mmap & poll should be fairly simple, looks like open & release cannot be
> dropped as it does some usb_autopm_get/put_interface() calls which I am not
> aware of.
I've looked at that, and there's a race condition in vb2_fop_poll() (for which
I've already sent a patch) and possible in vb2_mmap() (raised the issue on
#v4l today) as well that need to be fixed first.
Anyway, for this patch
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Have you tested it by the way ?
Should I take it in my tree or will you send a pull request for the whole
series ?
> >> ret = vb2_queue_init(&queue->queue);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-29 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 23:25 [PATCH v3] media: usb: uvc: use vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish helper Lad, Prabhakar
2014-11-27 21:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-11-28 17:06 ` Prabhakar Lad
2014-11-29 18:11 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-11-29 18:25 ` Prabhakar Lad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532665.63kW7uD9fo@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox