public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:05:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532999155.28585.56.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730162653.GM2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2066 bytes --]

On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> So for ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM we never touch ->active_mm and therefore
> ->active_mm == ->mm.

Close, but not true for kernel threads, which have a 
NULL ->mm, but a non-null ->active_mm that gets passed
to enter_lazy_tlb().

I stuck to the structure of your code, but ended up
removing all the ifdefs because the final mmdrop requires
that we actually keep track of the ->active_mm across
potentially several kernel->kernel context switches.

Ifdefs around the reference counting code are also not
needed, because grab_lazy_mm and drop_lazy_mm already
contain the equivalent of an ifdef themselves.

By morning I should know what the test results look
like. I expect they will be identical to my patches,
since the refcounting is disabled completely anyway :)

> > +       /*
> > +        * kernel -> kernel   lazy + transfer active
> > +        *   user -> kernel   lazy + mmgrab() active
> > +        *
> > +        * kernel ->   user   switch + mmdrop() active
> > +        *   user ->   user   switch
> > +        */
> > +       if (!next->mm) {                                // to
> > kernel
> > +               enter_lazy_tlb(prev->active_mm, next);
> > +
> 
> #ifndef ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM
> > +               next->active_mm = prev->active_mm;
> > +               if (prev->mm)                           // from
> > user
> > +                       mmgrab(prev->active_mm);
> 
> 		else
> 			prev->active_mm = NULL;
> > +#endif
> > +       } else {                                        // to user
> > +               switch_mm_irqs_off(prev->active_mm, next->mm,
> > next);
> > +
> 
> #ifndef ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM
> > +               if (!prev->mm) {                        // from
> > kernel
> > +                       /* will mmdrop() in finish_task_switch().
> > */
> > +                       rq->prev_mm = prev->active_mm;
> > +                       prev->active_mm = NULL;
> > +               }
> > +#endif
> 
> 
-- 
All Rights Reversed.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-31  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-28 21:53 [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86,tlb: clarify memory barrier in switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] smp: use __cpumask_set_cpu in on_each_cpu_cond Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:00     ` Rik van Riel
     [not found]       ` <E710FBA5-CC5E-4941-ACBF-4AB3424F1F68@amacapital.net>
2018-07-29 17:39         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 17:51         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 18:55           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 19:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86,mm: use on_each_cpu_cond for TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:58   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:02     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm,tlb: turn dummy defines into inline functions Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm,x86: skip cr4 and ldt reload when mm stays the same Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  4:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86,mm: remove leave_mm cpu argument Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] arch,mm: add config variable to skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm,x86: shoot down lazy TLB references at exit_mmap time Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  4:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:11     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 15:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 16:55         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54     ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86,tlb: really leave mm on shootdown Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54     ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-30  9:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 14:30         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 16:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 19:15             ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 19:30               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 19:36                 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 19:49                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 21:46                     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 22:00                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31  1:05             ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-07-31  9:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-31 14:29                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31 15:03                   ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-31 15:12                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 11:32 ` [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1532999155.28585.56.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox