From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74CAC433F5 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D53820870 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:13:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D53820870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728617AbeIJVIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:08:12 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:57706 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728160AbeIJVIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:08:12 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2018 09:13:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,356,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="255987272" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com ([10.54.74.20]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2018 09:13:23 -0700 Message-ID: <1536596003.11460.82.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active From: Sean Christopherson To: Borislav Petkov , Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?UTF-8?Q?Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:13:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180910155329.GB20286@zn.tnic> References: <1536343050-18532-1-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <1536343050-18532-6-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20180910122727.GE21815@zn.tnic> <026d5ca5-7b77-de6c-477e-ff39f0291ac0@amd.com> <20180910155329.GB20286@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 17:53 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:15:38AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > > > > > > > Now, the real question from all this SNAFU is, why can't all those point > > > to a single struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info and all CPUs read a single > > > thing? Why do they have to be per-CPU and thus waste so much memory? > You forgot to answer to the real question - why do we need those things > to be perCPU and why can't we use a single instance to share with *all* > CPUs? I can't speak to the actual TSC stuff, but... The pvclock ABI includes a per-vCPU bit, PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED, to indicate that the VM has been paused by the host.  The guest uses this information to update its watchdogs to avoid false positives.  I have no idea if there are use cases for setting STOPPED on a subset of vCPUs, but the ABI allows it so here we are...