From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BFBC04EBD for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853F3205C9 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="jVTtp5AJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 853F3205C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727503AbeJPWrw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:52 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:36926 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727086AbeJPWrv (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221CB8EE2BB; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUW3zPlzZ3O6; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [50.35.68.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB23D8EE0BA; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:57:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1539701821; bh=QIYEbFX3RzCuw5CAgO8uVWtY1K5IHjZTi+9VOurJMeM=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:From; b=jVTtp5AJe73MYogSGoz+wF5GUvwYP5ft0TuKem+b43tIJ+6hoGycPvop8UJAE/reX 2pvj6J3qbcKkQQ2SAakEYN1V2t8ksfRoQCtq1FxQCoKUZl44ZAIoD8QA4oSPGQUzKB rSQvfiIZ7mHPiCLDirlC8vuYVZQ5s3jy9EsqA6BM= Message-ID: <1539701820.2805.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] code of conduct fixes From: James Bottomley To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-kernel Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:57:00 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Resend to modify the third patch to add (except where required by law) and accumulate more tags --- Previous cover letter: Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want. If it gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two. --- Previous cover letter: We've had several threads discussing potential changes to the code of conduct but Mauro is the only person to have proposed an actual patch. In order to move the debate on, I'm presenting two patches, one to fix the email problem Mauro identified and the other to strip the enforcement section pending community discussion as Shuah suggested. I'll take responsibility for collecting any tags people want to add (review/ack/sign off, etc) and sending the patch in as a signed pull request before 4.19 final if they get enough community support. Note, I've sent both patches in as a series to facilitate review and discussion, but they are separable if one is looked on with less favour than the other. It was also a bit unclear which list to send this to, but I finally settled on linux-kernel as the catch all and ksummit-discuss since that's where most of the current discussion is. I can add other lists as people suggest them. James --- James Bottomley (3): code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.13.7