From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: disable direct I/O when unavailable
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:10:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1551111016.31902.149.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225153827.GA17442@linux-x5ow.site>
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 16:38 +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:49:04AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 2/25/19 1:37 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > > On 24/02/2019 11:54, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > > What is the status of iSCSI/SRP targets in this case ?
> > >
> > > iSCSI/SRP passes in the following:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Use O_DSYNC by default instead of O_SYNC to forgo syncing
> > > * of pure timestamp updates.
> > > */
> > > flags = O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_LARGEFILE | O_DSYNC;
> >
> > That code fragment comes from the LIO file backend. There is no requirement
> > for a SCSI target core file backend to use O_DSYNC. SCST allows users to
> > choose whether or not O_DSYNC should be used:
>
> Yes, LIO file backend is the in-tree equivalent to NVMe's file backend. That's
> why I copied it here.
>
>
> >
> > if (virt_dev->wt_flag && !virt_dev->nv_cache)
> > open_flags |= O_DSYNC;
> >
>
> OK. Do your open_flags include O_DIRECT per default as well?
I don't think it has ever been supported to pass O_DIRECT to filp_open().
As one can see in build_open_flags() O_DIRECT is ignored. The only way I
know of to submit direct I/O from kernel context is by setting the
IOCB_DIRECT flag.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-25 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-21 18:22 [PATCH] nvmet: disable direct I/O when unavailable Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-22 0:41 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-02-22 5:55 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-24 10:54 ` Max Gurtovoy
2019-02-25 9:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-25 14:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-25 15:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-25 16:10 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-02-25 21:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-08 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1551111016.31902.149.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox