From: Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: Device Driver Etiquette
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:12:46 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15604445.159241180797166445.JavaMail.root@jupiler.digium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12467610.159201180797054019.JavaMail.root@jupiler.digium.com>
----- "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Jun, 19:40, "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> > On 6/1/07, Matthew Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com> wrote:
> >
> > > is it acceptable (although
> > > not nice) to simply fix it this way, by disabling irqs while it
> loads
> > > the firmware?
> >
> > I would say to just disable IRQs while loading firmware. Almost
> every
> > server I maintain has some vendor driver which generates a "many
> lost
> > ticks!" message on load. As long as it's only done at module load
> > time it should be fine.
>
> For anything ~10s or more, you'll probably also need to call the
> timer
> update function to prevent soft lockup warning being generated.
Ahhh... so there is a way to get rid of that cursed message. I forgot to mention this in my original message, the only place that I had seen this problem is on a certain machine (Dell 2950) with a certain distribution (FC6) kernel. I had trimmed the code down to fit in 4K stacks already quite a bit.
I believe what actually made it crash and overflow the stack (the straw that breaks the camels back, so to speak) was the intermittent triggering of the softlockup detector. I think if I can disable that while the firmware is loading that will fix the stack overflow issues and correct my problem.
Matthew Fredrickson
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-02 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12467610.159201180797054019.JavaMail.root@jupiler.digium.com>
2007-06-02 15:12 ` Matt Fredrickson [this message]
2007-06-03 11:22 ` Device Driver Etiquette Daniel J Blueman
[not found] <17916027.160971180851607681.JavaMail.root@jupiler.digium.com>
2007-06-03 6:20 ` Matt Fredrickson
2007-06-01 23:16 Daniel J Blueman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-01 17:47 Matthew Fredrickson
2007-06-01 18:38 ` Lee Revell
2007-06-01 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-02 15:05 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-02 23:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-03 1:45 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15604445.159241180797166445.JavaMail.root@jupiler.digium.com \
--to=creslin@digium.com \
--cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox