From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260AbXJ3OPH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:15:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753319AbXJ3OO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:14:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57012 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753296AbXJ3OO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:14:56 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20071029122759.2846.83510.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: "Suzuki Takashi" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:14:49 +0000 Message-ID: <15631.1193753689@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Suzuki Takashi wrote: > Why don't you use `am33' for the arch name? History and the fact that 'mn10300' is what MEI called their arch when they originally gave us (RH) their kernel. There are kernels already out there running on consumer devices for which it is the mn10300 arch. David