From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix coalescing host bridge windows in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:44:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569389.72Ab6LcEbn@mistral> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52410B49.3050306@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1867 bytes --]
[Patch ping #4...]
On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:47:21 AM Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2013/9/23 14:15, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > [Resending due to no response to the original message in a week]
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a board with a BIOS bug that reports the following I/O port regions
> > in _CRS on one of the host bridges:
> >
> > 0x0000-0x03af // #0
> > 0x03e0-0x0cf7 // #1
> > 0x03b0-0x03bb // #2
> > 0x03c0-0x03df // #3
> > 0x0000-0xdfff // #4
> > 0xf000-0xffff // #5
> >
> > Obviously, region number #4 is erroneous as it overlaps with regions
> > #0..3.
> > The code in coalesce_windows() in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c attempts to recover
> > from such kind of BIOS bugs by merging the overlapping regions. Current
> > code expands region #0 to 0x0000-0xdffff and makes region #4 ignored. As
> > a result, overlap of the expanded region #0 with regions #1..3 remains
> > undetected (as the inner loop already compared them with region #0). As a
> > result, regions #1..3 are inserted into the resource tree even though
> > they overlap with adjusted region #0 - which later results in resource
> > conflicts for PCI devices with IO ports in one of those regions (e.g.,
> > for an PCI IDE controller in legacy mode - which has port 0x3f6). The
> > kernel then refuses to initialize these devices.
> >
> > The fix: instead of expanding res1 and ignoring res2, do the opposite. The
> > res2 window is yet to be compared against all windows between res1 and
> > res2
> > (regions #1..3 in the above example), so the resulting resource map will
> > include just the expanded region - and will ignore any overlapping ones.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
>
> It looks fine to me, but I have no platform to test it. :)
Thanks for a review. Could anybody push it into the tree? :)
For convenience, patch attached again.
Regards,
Alexey.
[-- Attachment #2: acpi.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 722 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index b30e937..7fb24e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -354,12 +354,12 @@ static void coalesce_windows(struct pci_root_info *info, unsigned long type)
* the kernel resource tree doesn't allow overlaps.
*/
if (resource_overlaps(res1, res2)) {
- res1->start = min(res1->start, res2->start);
- res1->end = max(res1->end, res2->end);
+ res2->start = min(res1->start, res2->start);
+ res2->end = max(res1->end, res2->end);
dev_info(&info->bridge->dev,
"host bridge window expanded to %pR; %pR ignored\n",
- res1, res2);
- res2->flags = 0;
+ res2, res1);
+ res1->flags = 0;
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-23 6:15 [PATCH] Fix coalescing host bridge windows in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c Alexey Neyman
2013-09-24 3:47 ` Yijing Wang
2013-09-28 7:12 ` Alexey Neyman
2013-10-03 18:44 ` Alexey Neyman [this message]
2013-10-03 19:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-10-03 23:16 ` Alexey Neyman
2013-10-09 19:30 ` Alexey Neyman
2013-10-09 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1569389.72Ab6LcEbn@mistral \
--to=stilor@att.net \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox