From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4207AC432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A9221D7C for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="SkqMrQKb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439699AbfIYQBG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:01:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:34812 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2439511AbfIYQBF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:01:05 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 3so7192238qta.1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wE7o18rA9f1oaiSrLT04Q82HAXBxKMsgWbvymZifnKw=; b=SkqMrQKbTN+NXMJ2fzwQ2PUgrpPvP6OQkXVj50wFBR3F5FBhYZpARNLhaxLZH6kmLi jiDcHfsXu83EX5Q55QCWht3wu/s06SOEQuklc8sNbT5HgRp5hX37KRjPTO1mNl3vYyxv AxDl4WMOwW1U+6mmETKpbNYL6YgFEzEmp+NqGlI14AtFPDO7CPNxvTpDpYoUNdHfznFx J3eujsmn0K4lSAeXb/KANtZyMCaahf7L3ORbNdKTWR/YPomnp/cGwqYWJCnqh29n47Aq RQ7pZBLbQoty6BjCukHTVNSXNxcxClD/SIWrH5ehuJBeQGICooMI7MmKlRWjw41ZVft6 4HWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wE7o18rA9f1oaiSrLT04Q82HAXBxKMsgWbvymZifnKw=; b=atMItB+qg/hEMTwP7xSzz8OlqKQDTeBpPhCB/ip/3Z0tJAwsYnmbR/3b793LrkKeR4 KKYlRTiIK0humXEmW4/p3CWSYlNs/HsriwVHgEPUcCcMdG81faIrcP0v5Zx/s4BqpZzW l5aJRguzh2FrI0NiNwJ1lUAW2X8a4RvYLqs6GVGlHQQnPSq0+lsrqPN+RYal2XW3gC/P f8tSJ9CE0aIuDNZjYKxUYDmWvamo2T79wLvvDFGI25ufn1XEjTT/KPGN2jTsOD9z+HT6 0U7VveqULEvmXTaeKu2kzmp9rLW/i+uyA9NAtlKL/Erlpx9eWGngZbE63uda+G1bU8Bw GJsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWnqG0WFo63c77pL95qv4C6+1xQSdbleR9zh+VuN/wl0WhoGoWU bWHRAcRBe06a3LEv+VkCaF9k2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzP1UPwIUGNslKSU1q+gwg/MeyuFYBDOZpmYJumxVb0J/cxQW7zvtSioCviXWbdxxVaKUUJwg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2c8f:: with SMTP id 15mr9585039qtw.3.1569427264317; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-41-57.bos.redhat.com (nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com. [66.187.233.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t63sm3225912qkf.48.2019.09.25.09.01.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1569427262.5576.225.camel@lca.pw> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't take the cpu_hotplug_lock From: Qian Cai To: David Hildenbrand , Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:01:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2f8c8099-8de0-eccc-2056-a79d2f97fbf7@redhat.com> References: <20190924143615.19628-1-david@redhat.com> <1569337401.5576.217.camel@lca.pw> <20190924151147.GB23050@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1569351244.5576.219.camel@lca.pw> <2f8c8099-8de0-eccc-2056-a79d2f97fbf7@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 09:02 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 24.09.19 20:54, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Tue 24-09-19 11:03:21, Qian Cai wrote: > > > [...] > > > > While at it, it might be a good time to rethink the whole locking over there, as > > > > it right now read files under /sys/kernel/slab/ could trigger a possible > > > > deadlock anyway. > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > [  442.452090][ T5224] -> #0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: > > > > [  442.459748][ T5224]        validate_chain+0xd10/0x2bcc > > > > [  442.464883][ T5224]        __lock_acquire+0x7f4/0xb8c > > > > [  442.469930][ T5224]        lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 > > > > [  442.474803][ T5224]        get_online_mems+0x54/0x150 > > > > [  442.479850][ T5224]        show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8 > > > > [  442.485072][ T5224]        total_objects_show+0x28/0x34 > > > > [  442.490292][ T5224]        slab_attr_show+0x38/0x54 > > > > [  442.495166][ T5224]        sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x198/0x2d4 > > > > [  442.500473][ T5224]        kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xcc > > > > [  442.505433][ T5224]        seq_read+0x30c/0x8a8 > > > > [  442.509958][ T5224]        kernfs_fop_read+0xa8/0x314 > > > > [  442.515007][ T5224]        __vfs_read+0x88/0x20c > > > > [  442.519620][ T5224]        vfs_read+0xd8/0x10c > > > > [  442.524060][ T5224]        ksys_read+0xb0/0x120 > > > > [  442.528586][ T5224]        __arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x88 > > > > [  442.533634][ T5224]        el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240 > > > > [  442.538768][ T5224]        el0_svc+0x8/0xc > > > > > > I believe the lock is not really needed here. We do not deallocated > > > pgdat of a hotremoved node nor destroy the slab state because an > > > existing slabs would prevent hotremove to continue in the first place. > > > > > > There are likely details to be checked of course but the lock just seems > > > bogus. > > > > Check 03afc0e25f7f ("slab: get_online_mems for > > kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink}"). It actually talk about the races during > > memory as well cpu hotplug, so it might even that cpu_hotplug_lock removal is > > problematic? > > > > Which removal are you referring to? get_online_mems() does not mess with > the cpu hotplug lock (and therefore this patch). The one in your patch. I suspect there might be races among the whole NUMA node hotplug, kmem_cache_create, and show_slab_objects(). See bfc8c90139eb ("mem- hotplug: implement get/put_online_mems") "kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink} need to get a stable value of cpu/node online mask, because they init/destroy/access per-cpu/node kmem_cache parts, which can be allocated or destroyed on cpu/mem hotplug." Both online_pages() and show_slab_objects() need to get a stable value of cpu/node online mask.