From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BF0C4360C for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 06:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B8820673 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 06:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728572AbfJLGX6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Oct 2019 02:23:58 -0400 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:42583 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726821AbfJLGX6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Oct 2019 02:23:58 -0400 X-UUID: b0f39b91104846af8790ca0483b51fe1-20191012 X-UUID: b0f39b91104846af8790ca0483b51fe1-20191012 Received: from mtkcas34.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1320974668; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:23:48 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS32N1.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:23:46 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:23:45 +0800 Message-ID: <1570861427.19130.65.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/mediatek: Use writel for TLB range invalidation From: Yong Wu To: Will Deacon CC: Matthias Brugger , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Evan Green , Robin Murphy , Tomasz Figa , , , , , , , Nicolas Boichat , , , Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:23:47 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20191011162950.yg4o77mlaicacne5@willie-the-truck> References: <1570627143-29441-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1570627143-29441-3-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <20191011162950.yg4o77mlaicacne5@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 0A33034A89B0C9BB9E3E78D19D549891FCC7ABDAE5C14ED4B95401F2380F2F052000:8 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 17:29 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:19:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > Use writel for the register F_MMU_INV_RANGE which is for triggering the > > HW work. We expect all the setting(iova_start/iova_end...) have already > > been finished before F_MMU_INV_RANGE. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anan.Sun > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > This is a improvement rather than fixing a issue. > > --- > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > index 24a13a6..607f92c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > @@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush(unsigned long iova, size_t size, > > writel_relaxed(iova, data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_START_A); > > writel_relaxed(iova + size - 1, > > data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_END_A); > > - writel_relaxed(F_MMU_INV_RANGE, > > - data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE); > > + writel(F_MMU_INV_RANGE, data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE); > > I don't understand this change. > > Why is it an "improvement" and which accesses are you ordering with the > writel? The register(F_MMU_INV_RANGE) will trigger HW to begin flush range. HW expect the other register iova_start/end/flush_type always is ready before trigger. thus I'd like use writel to guarantee the previous register has been finished. I didn't see the writel_relaxed cause some error in practice, we only think writel is necessary here in theory. so call it "improvement". > > Will