From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Luca Barbieri <ldb@ldb.ods.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux FSdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1]
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 15:03:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15730.4100.308481.326297@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1030835635.1422.39.camel@ldb>
>>>>> " " == Luca Barbieri <ldb@ldb.ods.org> writes:
> For example, rather than this;
<snip>
> you can just do this:
> - uid_t saved_fsuid = current->fsuid;
> + uid_t saved_fsuid = current->fscred.uid;
> kernel_cap_t saved_cap =
> current->cap_effective;
But I don't want to have to do that at all. Why should I change the
actual task's privileges in order to call down into a single VFS
function?
The point of VFS support for credentials is to eliminate these hacks,
and cut down on all this gratuitous changing of privilege. That's what
we want the API changes for.
Who cares if changing fsuid/fsgid is more expensive? The only place we
should actually be doing that is in sys_fsuid(), sys_fsgid(), and
possibly daemonize(), where adequate security checks can be made.
Cheers,
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-01 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-31 16:32 [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1] Trond Myklebust
2002-08-31 18:57 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-31 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-31 19:38 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-31 22:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-08-31 23:13 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 13:03 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2002-09-01 14:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 14:20 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 16:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 18:54 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 19:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 21:34 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 21:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 22:50 ` Luca Barbieri
[not found] ` <20020903034607.GF29452@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
2002-09-08 22:04 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-09 6:22 ` Jan Harkes
2002-09-09 11:17 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 14:33 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 16:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 18:42 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 19:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-09-01 21:36 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-09-01 15:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-01 15:35 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-31 19:51 ` Luca Barbieri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15730.4100.308481.326297@charged.uio.no \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=ldb@ldb.ods.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox