From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753139Ab0INRfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:35:09 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:36130 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751739Ab0INRfH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:35:07 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Maurus Cuelenaere Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= , Masayuki Ohtake , Randy Dunlap , Peter Korsgaard , Nicolas Ferre , linux-usb , Laurent Pinchart , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Fabien Chouteau , david Brownell , Christoph Egger , LKML , MeeGo , "Wang, Qi" , "Wang, Yong Y" , Andrew , Intel OTC , "Foster, Margie" , Arjan , Toshiharu Okada , Takahiro Shimizu , Tomoya Morinaga Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB device driver of Topcliff PCH In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200." <4C8F6FA5.7020201@gmail.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <4C85EE6F.6000706@dsn.okisemi.com> <000a01cb52fb$78fc2310$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> <4C8DFC56.8020006@gmail.com> <4C8F6FA5.7020201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1284485595_4681P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:33:15 -0400 Message-ID: <15771.1284485595@localhost> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 128.173.14.107 localhost Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020A.4C8FB1DD.015F,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-09-22 00:05:22, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1284485595_4681P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200, Maurus Cuelenaere said: > Ah, well IMHO it's better not to spam LKML with subsystem-related stuff.. On the flip side, posting to LKML as well means that it's a bit harder for a patch series to go totally down a rathole, because people outside the subsystem then have a chance to look at the code and point out where it's going in the wrong direction. My last code comment was regarding hardware I didn't have, and happened because I asked myself "What would happen if that code tried to run on my laptop?". Similarly, we see lots of stuff posted that looks good to those of us on 1-4 core systems, only to have somebody from SGI point out that it will add 45 hours to boot time on one of their big boxes. And so on. --==_Exmh_1284485595_4681P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFMj7HbcC3lWbTT17ARAkNfAJ0Vu5jNkQxpBBlpXqsFO7VvhIL7GQCfdBLN s+VeuxSI/F0OZNMSqSI+Q9k= =Tnlc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1284485595_4681P--