public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
	vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V3 7/7] perf: Clean up event context from sched_task()
Date: Wed,  8 Jan 2020 07:03:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1578495789-95006-7-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578495789-95006-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

No one uses event context in sched_task() anymore.

Remove the event context parameters from sched_task().
ctx_lock is useless as well.

Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---

No changes since V2

 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 8 ++------
 arch/x86/events/core.c          | 5 ++---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c    | 7 +++----
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c      | 2 +-
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c     | 3 +--
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h    | 8 +++-----
 include/linux/perf_event.h      | 3 +--
 kernel/events/core.c            | 4 +---
 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 99cb809..3c3631d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -126,10 +126,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
 
 static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
 static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_disable(struct perf_event *event) {}
-static void power_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-				 struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
-{
-}
+static void power_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in) {}
 static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw) {}
 static void pmao_restore_workaround(bool ebb) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 */
@@ -406,8 +403,7 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_disable(struct perf_event *event)
 /* Called from ctxsw to prevent one process's branch entries to
  * mingle with the other process's entries during context switch.
  */
-static void power_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-				 struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
+static void power_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
 {
 	if (!ppmu->bhrb_nr)
 		return;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 7046a59..43d0918 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2237,11 +2237,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group *x86_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
-static void x86_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-			       struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
+static void x86_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
 {
 	if (x86_pmu.sched_task)
-		x86_pmu.sched_task(ctx, task, sched_in);
+		x86_pmu.sched_task(task, sched_in);
 }
 
 void perf_check_microcode(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index bd18c83..f43ec24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3813,11 +3813,10 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
 	intel_cpuc_finish(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu));
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-				 struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
+static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
 {
-	intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(ctx, sched_in);
-	intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(ctx, task, sched_in);
+	intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(sched_in);
+	intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(task, sched_in);
 }
 
 static int intel_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index ce83950..d22af4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static inline bool pebs_needs_sched_cb(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 	return cpuc->n_pebs && (cpuc->n_pebs == cpuc->n_large_pebs);
 }
 
-void intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
+void intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(bool sched_in)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 20c1d7e..97fadfa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -423,8 +423,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->log_id;
 }
 
-void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-			      struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
+void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index ed287ba..84822cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -638,8 +638,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	void		(*cpu_dead)(int cpu);
 
 	void		(*check_microcode)(void);
-	void		(*sched_task)(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-				      struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
+	void		(*sched_task)(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel Arch Perfmon v2+
@@ -1009,7 +1008,7 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all(void);
 
-void intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in);
+void intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(bool sched_in);
 
 void intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(struct perf_event *event);
 
@@ -1017,8 +1016,7 @@ void intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(struct pebs_lbr *lbr);
 
 void intel_ds_init(void);
 
-void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-			      struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
+void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
 
 u64 lbr_from_signext_quirk_wr(u64 val);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 364b0d0..91d2d28 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -405,8 +405,7 @@ struct pmu {
 	/*
 	 * context-switches callback
 	 */
-	void (*sched_task)		(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
-					 struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
+	void (*sched_task)		(struct task_struct *task, bool sched_in);
 	/*
 	 * PMU specific data size
 	 */
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 23db381..623e520 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3347,13 +3347,11 @@ static void perf_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *prev,
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu->sched_task))
 			continue;
 
-		perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
 		perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
 
-		pmu->sched_task(cpuctx->task_ctx, sched_in ? next : prev, sched_in);
+		pmu->sched_task(sched_in ? next : prev, sched_in);
 
 		perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
-		perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-08 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-08 15:03 [RFC PATCH V3 1/7] perf: Save PMU specific data in task_struct kan.liang
2020-01-08 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH V3 2/7] perf: attach/detach PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-01-08 16:50   ` Andi Kleen
2020-01-08 19:52     ` Liang, Kan
2020-01-08 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH V3 3/7] perf: Supply task information to sched_task() kan.liang
2020-01-08 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH V3 4/7] perf/x86/lbr: Fix shorter LBRs call stacks for system-wide mode kan.liang
2020-01-08 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH V3 5/7] perf/x86: Remove swap_task_ctx() kan.liang
2020-01-08 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH V3 6/7] perf: Clean up pmu specific data kan.liang
2020-01-08 15:03 ` kan.liang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1578495789-95006-7-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox