Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

Macpaul Lin
2020-02-21T10:23:38Z

Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42)
> >
> > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > >> Hi Stephen,
> > >>
> > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43)
> > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
> > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.
> > >>>
> > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig
> > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts
> > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your
> > >> tree?
> > >>
> > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree.
> > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Matthias
> > >
> > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too.
> > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets?
> > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4?
> > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7?
> > >
> >
> > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to.
> >
>
> If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good
> to me.

Here comes the spilt patch sets.
1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/
2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/
But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter
in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7.
If resend cover-letter is required please let me know.

Regards,
Macpaul Lin