From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FCAC11D32 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED6320714 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=crapouillou.net header.i=@crapouillou.net header.b="LFgcDy1+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727874AbgBXPZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:34 -0500 Received: from outils.crapouillou.net ([89.234.176.41]:39764 "EHLO crapouillou.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727539AbgBXPZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crapouillou.net; s=mail; t=1582557931; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SmPgy2zJNFt//FFDsKzJvPnH2D7WIJX2Um97SB6yv+c=; b=LFgcDy1+ROVN5JpGz88s8QhlbuOHE3h8ALc+Z9060O/Mrdqm+FEkrgUqWw1BJ05pUgReqH AZu/manhY5V9y5dnsMJkCN5mbesaJWCIctAsJBznYNr2lo3BsQ92JTRnzbbegS3BODcoPD ufIDouoowNNxWM0auRjpUlLpA4sVhUw= Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:25:14 -0300 From: Paul Cercueil Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks To: Arnaud POULIQUEN Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , od@zcrc.me, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <1582557914.3.1@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20200211142614.13567-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20200211142614.13567-3-paul@crapouillou.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaud, Le mar., f=E9vr. 18, 2020 at 17:31, Arnaud POULIQUEN=20 a =E9crit : > Hi Paul, >=20 > I still wonder about the use of pm_runtime mechanism as a more=20 > generic alternative... The use of pm_runtime is perfect if CONFIG_PM is enabled, but otherwise=20 it's a bit cumbersome, as the clocks must be enabled in the probe. -Paul > Else just a minor remark inline. >=20 > On 2/11/20 3:26 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> The .prepare() callback is called before the firmware is loaded to >> memory. This is useful for instance in the case where some setup is >> required for the memory to be accessible. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil >> --- >>=20 >> Notes: >> v2-v4: No change >> v5: Move calls to prepare/unprepare to=20 >> rproc_fw_boot/rproc_shutdown >>=20 >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c=20 >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index fe5c7a2f9767..022b927e176b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -1373,6 +1373,14 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc=20 >> *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) >>=20 >> dev_info(dev, "Booting fw image %s, size %zd\n", name, fw->size); >>=20 >> + if (rproc->ops->prepare) { >> + ret =3D rproc->ops->prepare(rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare rproc: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> /* >> * if enabling an IOMMU isn't relevant for this rproc, this is >> * just a nop >> @@ -1380,7 +1388,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc,=20 >> const struct firmware *fw) >> ret =3D rproc_enable_iommu(rproc); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(dev, "can't enable iommu: %d\n", ret); >> - return ret; >> + goto unprepare_rproc; >> } >>=20 >> rproc->bootaddr =3D rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw); >> @@ -1424,6 +1432,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc,=20 >> const struct firmware *fw) >> rproc->table_ptr =3D NULL; >> disable_iommu: >> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc); >> +unprepare_rproc: >> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) >> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); >> return ret; >> } >>=20 >> @@ -1823,6 +1834,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) >>=20 >> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc); >>=20 >> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) >> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); >> + >> /* Free the copy of the resource table */ >> kfree(rproc->cached_table); >> rproc->cached_table =3D NULL; >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> index 5f201f0c86c3..a6272d1ba384 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { >>=20 >> /** >> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers >> + * @prepare: prepare the device for power up (before the firmware=20 >> is loaded) >> + * @unprepare: unprepare the device after it is stopped >=20 > Would be nice here to precise that these functions are optional > you can look at rproc_ops struct for example. >=20 > Regards, > Arnaud >=20 >> * @start: power on the device and boot it >> * @stop: power off the device >> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter) >> @@ -371,6 +373,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { >> * @get_boot_addr: get boot address to entry point specified in=20 >> firmware >> */ >> struct rproc_ops { >> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc); >> + void (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc); >> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc); >> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc); >> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid); >>=20 =