From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ziqian SUN <zsun@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH -tip V6 6/6] kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:03:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158927060954.27680.8740399526358942446.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158927054236.27680.18209720730136003586.stgit@devnote2>
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/kprobes.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
index 645fd401c856..53c4f2c1d658 100644
--- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct kretprobe_instance {
kprobe_opcode_t *ret_addr;
struct task_struct *task;
void *fp;
- char data[0];
+ char data[];
};
struct kretprobe_blackpoint {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 8:02 [PATCH -tip V6 0/6] kprobes: Fixes mutex, rcu-list warnings and cleanups Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:02 ` [PATCH -tip V6 1/6] kprobes: Suppress the suspicious RCU warning on kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:02 ` [PATCH -tip V6 2/6] kprobes: Use non RCU traversal APIs on kprobe_tables if possible Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:02 ` [PATCH -tip V6 3/6] kprobes: Fix to protect kick_kprobe_optimizer() by kprobe_mutex Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:03 ` [PATCH -tip V6 4/6] kprobes: Remove redundant arch_disarm_kprobe() call Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:03 ` [PATCH -tip V6 5/6] kretprobe: Prevent triggering kretprobe from within kprobe_flush_task Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-12 8:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-05-27 14:49 ` [PATCH -tip V6 0/6] kprobes: Fixes mutex, rcu-list warnings and cleanups Masami Hiramatsu
2020-06-14 15:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-16 19:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-16 19:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-17 14:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158927060954.27680.8740399526358942446.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zsun@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox