From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] genirq: Do not test disabled IRQs with DEBUG_SHIRQ
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:07:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592208439-17594-3-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592208439-17594-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
Testing events during freeing of disabled shared interrupts
(CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ) leads to false positives. The driver disabled
interrupts on purpose to be sure that they will not fire during device
removal.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
Changes since v1:
1. New patch.
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 761911168438..f19f0dedc30d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1775,12 +1775,14 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
/*
* It's a shared IRQ -- the driver ought to be prepared for an IRQ
* event to happen even now it's being freed, so let's make sure that
- * is so by doing an extra call to the handler ....
+ * is so by doing an extra call to the handler.
+ * Although the driver could disable the interrupts just before freeing
+ * just to avoid such trouble - don't test it then.
*
* ( We do this after actually deregistering it, to make sure that a
* 'real' IRQ doesn't run in parallel with our fake. )
*/
- if (action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) {
+ if (action->flags & IRQF_SHARED && !desc->depth) {
local_irq_save(flags);
action->handler(irq, dev_id);
local_irq_restore(flags);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 8:07 [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix external abort on interrupt in exit paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Initialize completion before possible interrupt Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 8:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2020-06-15 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] genirq: Do not test disabled IRQs with DEBUG_SHIRQ Mark Brown
2020-06-16 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-16 10:39 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-17 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-15 8:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix external abort on interrupt in exit paths Marc Kleine-Budde
2020-06-15 9:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 12:30 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-15 12:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:10 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-15 13:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:24 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-15 13:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:36 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-15 13:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 14:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 14:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 14:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 13:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-15 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-15 13:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1592208439-17594-3-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox