From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointer for LBR read
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:03:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592575449-64278-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592575449-64278-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The method to read Architectural LBRs is different from previous
model-specific LBR. Perf has to implement a different function.
A function pointer for LBR read is introduced. Perf should initialize
the corresponding function at boot time, and avoid checking lbr_format
at run time.
The current 64-bit LBR read function is set as default.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 9 +++------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 995acdb..03b17d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3955,6 +3955,7 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
.lbr_enable = intel_pmu_lbr_enable,
.lbr_disable = intel_pmu_lbr_disable,
.lbr_reset = intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64,
+ .lbr_read = intel_pmu_lbr_read_64,
};
static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
@@ -4004,6 +4005,7 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
.lbr_enable = intel_pmu_lbr_enable,
.lbr_disable = intel_pmu_lbr_disable,
.lbr_reset = intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64,
+ .lbr_read = intel_pmu_lbr_read_64,
};
static __init void intel_clovertown_quirk(void)
@@ -4630,8 +4632,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities = capabilities;
}
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_32)
+ if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_32) {
x86_pmu.lbr_reset = intel_pmu_lbr_reset_32;
+ x86_pmu.lbr_read = intel_pmu_lbr_read_32;
+ }
intel_ds_init();
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index ff320d1..d762c76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_disable();
}
-static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
+void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
{
unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
* is the same as the linear address, allowing us to merge the LIP and EIP
* LBR formats.
*/
-static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
+void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
{
bool need_info = false, call_stack = false;
unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
@@ -683,10 +683,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
if (!cpuc->lbr_users || cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users)
return;
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_32)
- intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(cpuc);
- else
- intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(cpuc);
+ x86_pmu.lbr_read(cpuc);
intel_pmu_lbr_filter(cpuc);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index abf95ef..e2e086c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
void (*lbr_enable)(bool pmi);
void (*lbr_disable)(void);
void (*lbr_reset)(void);
+ void (*lbr_read)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
/*
* Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive
@@ -1086,6 +1087,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable(void);
void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void);
+void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
+
+void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
+
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void);
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 14:03 [PATCH 00/21] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/21] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 02/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointers for LBR enable and disable kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 03/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 05/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 06/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 07/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 08/21] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 09/21] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 10/21] perf/x86/intel: Check Arch LBR MSRs kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 11/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-06-19 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 19:15 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 12/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 19:40 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 13/21] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 14/21] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 15/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 16/21] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 17/21] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-22 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 17:47 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 18:05 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 18:46 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 18/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 19/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 20/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 22:28 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 21/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-06-22 18:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-06-22 19:11 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 19:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1592575449-64278-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox