From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:03:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592575449-64278-8-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592575449-64278-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The type of task_ctx is hardcoded as struct x86_perf_task_context,
which doesn't apply for Architecture LBR. For example, Architecture LBR
doesn't have the TOS MSR. The number of LBR entries is variable. A new
struct will be introduced for Architecture LBR. Perf has to determine
the type of task_ctx at run time.
The type of task_ctx pointer is changed to 'void *', which will be
determined at run time.
The generic LBR optimization can be shared between Architecture LBR and
model-specific LBR. Both need to access the structure for the generic
LBR optimization. A helper task_context_opt() is introduced to retrieve
the pointer of the structure at run time.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 7 +++++-
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index f220a4c..1c253ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -351,17 +351,17 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
}
-static bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(void *ctx)
{
- return !rdlbr_from(task_ctx->tos);
+ return !rdlbr_from(((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->tos);
}
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
+ if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
+ task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
return;
}
@@ -371,16 +371,16 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
* - No one else touched them, and
* - Was not cleared in Cstate
*/
- if ((task_ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
- (task_ctx->opt.log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
- !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(task_ctx)) {
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+ if ((ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
+ (task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
+ !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(ctx)) {
+ task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
return;
}
- x86_pmu.lbr_restore(task_ctx);
+ x86_pmu.lbr_restore(ctx);
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+ task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
}
void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
@@ -406,27 +406,27 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
task_ctx->tos = tos;
}
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+ if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
+ task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
return;
}
- x86_pmu.lbr_save(task_ctx);
+ x86_pmu.lbr_save(ctx);
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
+ task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
- cpuc->last_task_ctx = task_ctx;
- cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->opt.log_id;
+ cpuc->last_task_ctx = ctx;
+ cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id;
}
void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
struct perf_event_context *next)
{
- struct x86_perf_task_context *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
+ void *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
swap(prev->task_ctx_data, next->task_ctx_data);
@@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
if (!prev_ctx_data || !next_ctx_data)
return;
- swap(prev_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users,
- next_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users);
+ swap(task_context_opt(prev_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users,
+ task_context_opt(next_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users);
}
void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
+ void *task_ctx;
if (!cpuc->lbr_users)
return;
@@ -486,17 +486,14 @@ static inline bool branch_user_callstack(unsigned br_sel)
void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
return;
cpuc->br_sel = event->hw.branch_reg.reg;
- if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
- task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users++;
- }
+ if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+ task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users++;
/*
* Request pmu::sched_task() callback, which will fire inside the
@@ -527,16 +524,13 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
return;
if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) &&
- event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
- task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
- task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users--;
- }
+ event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+ task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users--;
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && event->attr.precise_ip > 0)
cpuc->lbr_pebs_users--;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index fd73c6c..e33d348 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
struct perf_branch_entry lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
struct er_account *lbr_sel;
u64 br_sel;
- struct x86_perf_task_context *last_task_ctx;
+ void *last_task_ctx;
int last_log_id;
/*
@@ -798,6 +798,11 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_ht_attr event_attr_##v = { \
struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void);
extern struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
+static inline struct x86_perf_task_context_opt *task_context_opt(void *ctx)
+{
+ return &((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->opt;
+}
+
static inline bool x86_pmu_has_lbr_callstack(void)
{
return x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map &&
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 14:03 [PATCH 00/21] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/21] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 02/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointers for LBR enable and disable kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 03/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 04/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 05/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 06/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 08/21] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 09/21] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 10/21] perf/x86/intel: Check Arch LBR MSRs kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:03 ` [PATCH 11/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-06-19 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 19:15 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 12/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 19:40 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 13/21] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 14/21] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 15/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 16/21] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 17/21] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-22 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 17:47 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 18:05 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 18:46 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 18/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 19/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 20/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-06-19 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 22:28 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 21/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-06-22 18:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-06-22 19:11 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-22 19:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1592575449-64278-8-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox