From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C123D68 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 03:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722568279; cv=none; b=oWVeQrUpRRVPCcZwgzA3rrE/dle4ffS13QvDaY0u6h3BkRgCQdwyMB3JEI0V2hZs2Gb1Z+EVvKhyvGiQzQVh398Fd6PkrIcsr0VzatpG02emE+YIKbjfMvrwGl07B4vZRxyeH9BAM1yFxdHMTVn6Q5tvPhynjnE46TKg+R8f+e0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722568279; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IvTN9RUuaMw52Yy78L9/uujylMXKbSELTdGuhqvLHzs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uYB5dfP70h/PUnd4tJ4DuU+qpIm4T6uvdT97ey/SZhkLOBbXk36OhUvtVEzU7ytIFGLoCjrQ0icU3a+n5zK3RtJS3fl6tJ03rw8Qw4TpE5RMMwV9vt167nRbmhmMcNHDwj7f2Y707xCBThdfJyjRhk7d/cUPZAkSI0WlHA5BJNU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=mqtB5b6n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="mqtB5b6n" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1722568275; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=12DXJCyM5dEPtaGag3N2aiCBqyKJKN9vuLRg7UajN00=; b=mqtB5b6naRK7Sj2kaLloMRV5pLFi8aSw/Sb+rwUfDNx7lgtoXn+S+LLGgDgupXnedraMhjTImg06jMpfnLN8EX67jub6EWaiPQj1RnaHFXbhUXkxKEVRzfdtBKo+6NXM35HPy559NWaw3odEi90oorjEFONd0u7pnyJTsqKrnIc= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R721e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033045046011;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=12;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0WBvmIPN_1722568272; Received: from 30.97.56.76(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WBvmIPN_1722568272) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:11:13 +0800 Message-ID: <15d93ced-ffa5-4b87-9dea-bcf8cfaf44e9@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:11:12 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: shmem: avoid allocating huge pages larger than MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER for shmem To: Andrew Morton Cc: Kefeng Wang , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, ziy@nvidia.com, gshan@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <117121665254442c3c7f585248296495e5e2b45c.1722404078.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <87769ae8-b6c6-4454-925d-1864364af9c8@huawei.com> <20240731134802.00541e78813997f3c59df36c@linux-foundation.org> <20240801125552.12dc70cbe7220205a4a1a9ce@linux-foundation.org> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: <20240801125552.12dc70cbe7220205a4a1a9ce@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/8/2 03:55, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:06:59 +0800 Baolin Wang wrote: > >> >> >> On 2024/8/1 04:48, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:22:17 +0800 Baolin Wang wrote: >>> >>>> (Hope Andrew can help to squash these changes :)) >>> >>> I'm seeing some rejects against, amongst other things, your own "Some >>> cleanups for shmem" series. >>> >>> So... v2, please? >> >> These two bugfix patches are based on the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch >> and need to be merged into 6.11-rcX, so they should be queued first. > > OK. > >> For the 'Some cleanups for shmem' series, I can send a new V4 version to >> you after resolving conflicts with the shmem bugfix patches. Sorry for >> the inconvenience. > > I fixed things up. Thank you for your help, Andrew. I have checked the patches after resolving the conflicts, and all look good.