Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/9] bpf: Allow LSM programs to use bpf spin locks

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri,  6 Nov 2020 10:37:39 +0000 you wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> 
> Usage of spin locks was not allowed for tracing programs due to
> insufficient preemption checks. The verifier does not currently prevent
> LSM programs from using spin locks, but the helpers are not exposed
> via bpf_lsm_func_proto.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v6,1/9] bpf: Allow LSM programs to use bpf spin locks
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9e7a4d9831e8
  - [bpf-next,v6,2/9] bpf: Implement task local storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4cf1bc1f1045
  - [bpf-next,v6,3/9] libbpf: Add support for task local storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8885274d2259
  - [bpf-next,v6,4/9] bpftool: Add support for task local storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/864ab0616dcc
  - [bpf-next,v6,5/9] bpf: Implement get_current_task_btf and RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ca1032ab7ab
  - [bpf-next,v6,6/9] bpf: Fix tests for local_storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f0e5ba0bc481
  - [bpf-next,v6,7/9] bpf: Update selftests for local_storage to use vmlinux.h
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a367efa71b3f
  - [bpf-next,v6,8/9] bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9cde3beeadb3
  - [bpf-next,v6,9/9] bpf: Exercise syscall operations for inode and sk storage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4170bc6baa54

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html