From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263186AbTEBV5W (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 17:57:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263187AbTEBV5W (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 17:57:22 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:14014 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263186AbTEBV5U (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 17:57:20 -0400 From: Paul Mackerras MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16050.60554.651489.795368@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 08:09:14 +1000 To: James Simmons Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mach64_gx.c In-Reply-To: References: <16050.3732.615164.697680@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under Emacs 21.3.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Simmons writes: > Has anyone tested this chipset on a PPC 64? There aren't any PPC64 boxes with this chipset (ATI Mach64 GX), since all past and current PPC64 boxes are IBM servers. I suppose one could find an old ATI Mach64 PCI card and put it in a PPC64 box, but I don't know why you would do that instead of putting in a PCI radeon or something. :) Regards, Paul.