public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:19:01 MET-1	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1605A1153EC8@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)

On 20 Feb 01 at 7:11, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Alan Cox]
> > There is an assumption in the kernel that only the task changes its
> > own uid and other related data.
> 
> Fair enough but could you explain the potential problems?  And how is
> it different from sys_setpriority?

Look at what fs/open.c:sys_access does, at least. It switches
fsuid/fsgid/capabilities during its execution.

sys_setpriority is completely different, no piece of kernel changes that
and nothing except schedule() touches that. But {,fs,e}[ug]id are used
here and there through whole kernel. Also, changing priority does not
remove some access rights from your process, while changing uid/gid does...
                                        Petr Vandrovec
                                        vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
                                        

             reply	other threads:[~2001-02-20 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-20 14:19 Petr Vandrovec [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-23 17:13 [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall Bernd Jendrissek
2001-02-19 22:18 BERECZ Szabolcs
2001-02-20  5:01 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-20 10:53   ` Martin Dalecki
2001-02-20 13:00     ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-20 11:42   ` Alan Cox
2001-02-20 13:11     ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-20 13:52       ` Alan Cox
2001-02-20 17:04         ` BERECZ Szabolcs
2000-01-01  0:28           ` Pavel Machek
2001-02-21  4:19           ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-20 12:14   ` BERECZ Szabolcs
2001-02-20 12:52     ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-20 12:02 ` Philipp Rumpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1605A1153EC8@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz \
    --to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@cadcamlab.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox