From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] x86/insn: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:50:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160689905099.3084105.7880450206184269465.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
Hi,
Here are the patches to fix the wrong loop boundary check
on insn.prefixes.bytes[] array.
Kees Cook reported that this issue that there are similar
wrong boundary check patterns in the x86 code.
Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 (*) and i < 4 instead
of insn.prefixes.nbytes.
(*) Note that insn.prefixes.bytes[] should be zeroed in insn_init()
before decoding, and 0x00 is not a legacy prefix. So if you see 0
on insn.prefix.bytes[], it indicates the end of the array. Or,
if the prefixes.bytes[] is filled with prefix bytes, we can check
the index is less than 4.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (3):
x86/sev-es: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
x86/uprobes: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
x86/insn-eval: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-02 8:50 Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-12-02 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/sev-es: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 15:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-02 19:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-12-03 2:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/uprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 14:51 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-12-03 4:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-12-03 2:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 8:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/insn-eval: " Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160689905099.3084105.7880450206184269465.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox