From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: Tell lockdep about kprobe nesting
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:31:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160761426940.3585575.9968752396885952490.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160761425763.3585575.15837172081484340228.stgit@devnote2>
From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 645f224e7ba2f4200bf163153d384ceb0de5462e upstream.
Since the kprobe handlers have protection that prohibits other handlers from
executing in other contexts (like if an NMI comes in while processing a
kprobe, and executes the same kprobe, it will get fail with a "busy"
return). Lockdep is unaware of this protection. Use lockdep's nesting api to
differentiate between locks taken in INT3 context and other context to
suppress the false warnings.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102160234.fa0ae70915ad9e2b21c08b85@kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9.x
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index b885d884603d..1b7fd1ab8ddc 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1250,7 +1250,13 @@ __acquires(hlist_lock)
*head = &kretprobe_inst_table[hash];
hlist_lock = kretprobe_table_lock_ptr(hash);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(hlist_lock, *flags);
+ /*
+ * Nested is a workaround that will soon not be needed.
+ * There's other protections that make sure the same lock
+ * is not taken on the same CPU that lockdep is unaware of.
+ * Differentiate when it is taken in NMI context.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested(hlist_lock, *flags, !!in_nmi());
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kretprobe_hash_lock);
@@ -1259,7 +1265,13 @@ static void kretprobe_table_lock(unsigned long hash,
__acquires(hlist_lock)
{
raw_spinlock_t *hlist_lock = kretprobe_table_lock_ptr(hash);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(hlist_lock, *flags);
+ /*
+ * Nested is a workaround that will soon not be needed.
+ * There's other protections that make sure the same lock
+ * is not taken on the same CPU that lockdep is unaware of.
+ * Differentiate when it is taken in NMI context.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested(hlist_lock, *flags, !!in_nmi());
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kretprobe_table_lock);
@@ -1942,7 +1954,12 @@ static int pre_handler_kretprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
/* TODO: consider to only swap the RA after the last pre_handler fired */
hash = hash_ptr(current, KPROBE_HASH_BITS);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rp->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * Nested is a workaround that will soon not be needed.
+ * There's other protections that make sure the same lock
+ * is not taken on the same CPU that lockdep is unaware of.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&rp->lock, flags, 1);
if (!hlist_empty(&rp->free_instances)) {
ri = hlist_entry(rp->free_instances.first,
struct kretprobe_instance, hlist);
@@ -1953,7 +1970,7 @@ static int pre_handler_kretprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
ri->task = current;
if (rp->entry_handler && rp->entry_handler(ri, regs)) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&rp->lock, flags, 1);
hlist_add_head(&ri->hlist, &rp->free_instances);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->lock, flags);
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 15:30 [PATCH 1/2] kprobes: Remove NMI context check Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-10 15:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-12-11 14:47 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160761426940.3585575.9968752396885952490.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox