From: Dave Neuer <mr.fred.smoothie@gmail.com>
To: Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:29:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161717d505072007293830074a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DE3890.2040501@telia.com>
On 7/20/05, Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com> wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko skrev:
>
> >
> >Why do you care? I bet that differences between i686 code and pentium4 code
> >are well below noise level.
> >--
> >vda
> >
> For x86_64 the flags -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow are always
> used for compilation. Why is'nt the same thing done for x86 instead of
> using -march=i686 -mtune=?.
>
> -march=athlon and -march=k6 includes -m3dnow and -mmmx, are those ok for
> the kernel but -msse isn't?
>
As Kerin pointed out, gcc 4.0 supports auto-vectorization, so in
theory, these options might provide better performance on some
compilers. Apparently SSE is not enabled by default any more for P4
because of a known bug w/ some compilers. People using gcc > 4.0 can
obviously override it.
Really, w/out the presence of auto-vectorization support in the
compiler none of the vector extensions are necessary. The only things
that really matter are -mcpu and -mtune: what instruction set your CPU
supports and the optimum instruction scheduling characteristics for
your CPU, respectively.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-20 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-19 17:07 Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ? Ivan Yosifov
2005-07-19 17:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-19 18:35 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-07-20 8:03 ` Kerin Millar
2005-07-20 7:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-20 8:23 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-07-20 9:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-20 9:44 ` Kerin Millar
2005-07-20 9:25 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-07-20 10:38 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-07-20 11:33 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-07-20 11:42 ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-20 14:29 ` Dave Neuer [this message]
[not found] <4s3M3-ph-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4s4y2-Rt-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4s5aD-1sw-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-07-19 20:12 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-07-19 20:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-19 20:19 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161717d505072007293830074a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mr.fred.smoothie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mr.fred.smoothie@pobox.com \
--cc=simon.strandman@telia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox