From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:30:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:30:25 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:26297 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:30:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:31:06 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: William Lee Irwin III cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.5.52-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Message-ID: <162390000.1040153466@flay> In-Reply-To: <20021217174958.GY2690@holomorphy.com> References: <19270000.1038270642@flay> <134580000.1039414279@titus> <32230000.1039502522@titus> <568990000.1040112629@titus> <20021217174958.GY2690@holomorphy.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> The patchset contains mainly scalability and NUMA stuff, and >> anything else that stops things from irritating me. It's meant >> to be pretty stable, not so much a testing ground for new stuff. >> I'd be very interested in feedback from other people running >> large SMP or NUMA boxes. >> http://www.aracnet.com/~fletch/linux/2.5.52/patch-2.5.52-mjb1.bz2 > > pfn_to_nid() got lots of icache misses. Try using a macro. How much difference does this make? M.