* [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred
@ 2010-06-25 13:33 Jiri Olsa
2010-07-02 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2010-06-25 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module
Cc: David Howells, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel, Paul E. McKenney
BZ 591015 - kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:168
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591015
Above bugzilla reported bug during the releasing of
old cred structure.
There is reproducer attached to the bugzilla.
The issue is caused by releasing old cred struct while other
kernel path might be still using it. This leads to cred->usage
inconsistency inside the __put_cred and triggering the bug.
Following kernel paths are affected:
The CPU1 path is setting the new groups creds.
The CPU2 path is cat /proc/PID/status
CPU 1 CPU 2
sys_setgroups proc_pid_status
set_current_groups task_state
commit_creds rcu_read_lock
put_cred ...
__put_cred get_cred
BUG_ON(usage != 0) ...
rcu_read_unlock
If __put_cred got executed during the CPU2 holding the reference
the BUG_ON inside __put_cred is trigered.
I think there's no need to get the cred refference as long as
the 'cred' handling stays inside the rcu_read_lock block.
And the condition of __task_cred 'make sure task doesn't go away',
is done by proc_single_show as this is the proc file.
wbr,
jirka
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 9b58d38..ac3b3a4 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
if (tracer)
tpid = task_pid_nr_ns(tracer, ns);
}
- cred = get_cred((struct cred *) __task_cred(p));
+ cred = __task_cred(p);
seq_printf(m,
"State:\t%s\n"
"Tgid:\t%d\n"
@@ -199,15 +199,14 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
"FDSize:\t%d\n"
"Groups:\t",
fdt ? fdt->max_fds : 0);
- rcu_read_unlock();
group_info = cred->group_info;
task_unlock(p);
for (g = 0; g < min(group_info->ngroups, NGROUPS_SMALL); g++)
seq_printf(m, "%d ", GROUP_AT(group_info, g));
- put_cred(cred);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
seq_printf(m, "\n");
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred
2010-06-25 13:33 [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred Jiri Olsa
@ 2010-07-02 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-07-27 12:15 ` [PATCH] cred - BUG: " Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2010-07-02 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module
Cc: David Howells, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel, Paul E. McKenney
hi,
any feedback?
jirka
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:33:33AM -0400, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> BZ 591015 - kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:168
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591015
>
> Above bugzilla reported bug during the releasing of
> old cred structure.
>
> There is reproducer attached to the bugzilla.
>
> The issue is caused by releasing old cred struct while other
> kernel path might be still using it. This leads to cred->usage
> inconsistency inside the __put_cred and triggering the bug.
>
> Following kernel paths are affected:
>
> The CPU1 path is setting the new groups creds.
> The CPU2 path is cat /proc/PID/status
>
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
>
> sys_setgroups proc_pid_status
> set_current_groups task_state
> commit_creds rcu_read_lock
> put_cred ...
> __put_cred get_cred
> BUG_ON(usage != 0) ...
> rcu_read_unlock
>
>
>
> If __put_cred got executed during the CPU2 holding the reference
> the BUG_ON inside __put_cred is trigered.
>
> I think there's no need to get the cred refference as long as
> the 'cred' handling stays inside the rcu_read_lock block.
>
> And the condition of __task_cred 'make sure task doesn't go away',
> is done by proc_single_show as this is the proc file.
>
> wbr,
> jirka
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 9b58d38..ac3b3a4 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> if (tracer)
> tpid = task_pid_nr_ns(tracer, ns);
> }
> - cred = get_cred((struct cred *) __task_cred(p));
> + cred = __task_cred(p);
> seq_printf(m,
> "State:\t%s\n"
> "Tgid:\t%d\n"
> @@ -199,15 +199,14 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> "FDSize:\t%d\n"
> "Groups:\t",
> fdt ? fdt->max_fds : 0);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> group_info = cred->group_info;
> task_unlock(p);
>
> for (g = 0; g < min(group_info->ngroups, NGROUPS_SMALL); g++)
> seq_printf(m, "%d ", GROUP_AT(group_info, g));
> - put_cred(cred);
>
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> seq_printf(m, "\n");
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cred - BUG: synchronize rcu before releasing cred
2010-07-02 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2010-07-27 12:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-07-27 12:43 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2010-07-27 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module, David Howells, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel,
Paul E. McKenney
hi,
any feedback?
jirka
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:14:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> any feedback?
>
> jirka
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:33:33AM -0400, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > BZ 591015 - kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:168
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591015
> >
> > Above bugzilla reported bug during the releasing of
> > old cred structure.
> >
> > There is reproducer attached to the bugzilla.
> >
> > The issue is caused by releasing old cred struct while other
> > kernel path might be still using it. This leads to cred->usage
> > inconsistency inside the __put_cred and triggering the bug.
> >
> > Following kernel paths are affected:
> >
> > The CPU1 path is setting the new groups creds.
> > The CPU2 path is cat /proc/PID/status
> >
> >
> > CPU 1 CPU 2
> >
> > sys_setgroups proc_pid_status
> > set_current_groups task_state
> > commit_creds rcu_read_lock
> > put_cred ...
> > __put_cred get_cred
> > BUG_ON(usage != 0) ...
> > rcu_read_unlock
> >
> >
> >
> > If __put_cred got executed during the CPU2 holding the reference
> > the BUG_ON inside __put_cred is trigered.
> >
> > I think there's no need to get the cred refference as long as
> > the 'cred' handling stays inside the rcu_read_lock block.
> >
> > And the condition of __task_cred 'make sure task doesn't go away',
> > is done by proc_single_show as this is the proc file.
> >
> > wbr,
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> > index 9b58d38..ac3b3a4 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> > if (tracer)
> > tpid = task_pid_nr_ns(tracer, ns);
> > }
> > - cred = get_cred((struct cred *) __task_cred(p));
> > + cred = __task_cred(p);
> > seq_printf(m,
> > "State:\t%s\n"
> > "Tgid:\t%d\n"
> > @@ -199,15 +199,14 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> > "FDSize:\t%d\n"
> > "Groups:\t",
> > fdt ? fdt->max_fds : 0);
> > - rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > group_info = cred->group_info;
> > task_unlock(p);
> >
> > for (g = 0; g < min(group_info->ngroups, NGROUPS_SMALL); g++)
> > seq_printf(m, "%d ", GROUP_AT(group_info, g));
> > - put_cred(cred);
> >
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > seq_printf(m, "\n");
> > }
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cred - BUG: synchronize rcu before releasing cred
2010-07-27 12:15 ` [PATCH] cred - BUG: " Jiri Olsa
@ 2010-07-27 12:43 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2010-07-27 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: dhowells, linux-security-module, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel,
Paul E. McKenney
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> any feedback?
Guess no one's objecting. Post it to Linus then.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-27 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-25 13:33 [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred Jiri Olsa
2010-07-02 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-07-27 12:15 ` [PATCH] cred - BUG: " Jiri Olsa
2010-07-27 12:43 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox