From: tridge@samba.org
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and case-insensitivity
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:50:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16435.60448.70856.791580@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181427230.2686@home.osdl.org>
Linus,
> And I bet the performance advantages of _not_ doing native case
> insensitivity are likely to dominate hugely.
This part I just don't understand at all. The proposed changes would
be extremely cheap performance wise as you are just replacing one hash
with another, and dealing with one extra context bit in the
dcache. There is no way that this could come anywhere near the cost of
doing linear directory scans.
The hash function would be slightly more expensive (when enabled), but
not much, especially when you put in the obvious optimisation for 7
bit characters. The string comparison function in a couple of places
would also become more expensive, but once again it would only be
expensive for case-insensitive processes and benefits from the 7 bit
optimisation so that the average case will only be very slightly more
expensive than the current function.
Fair enough that you don't want to do this for code complexity
reasons, but please don't tell me it would be slower than what we have
to do now.
Try an strace of Samba trying to unlink() a non-existant file in a
large directory. It's enough to make you want to curl up and die :)
Cheers, Tridge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-18 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-17 4:12 UTF-8 and case-insensitivity tridge
2004-02-17 5:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 6:54 ` tridge
2004-02-17 8:33 ` Neil Brown
2004-02-17 22:48 ` tridge
2004-02-18 0:06 ` Neil Brown
2004-02-18 9:47 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-17 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 19:44 ` viro
2004-02-17 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 20:17 ` viro
2004-02-17 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 21:08 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-02-17 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-17 22:27 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-02-18 3:02 ` tridge
2004-02-17 23:57 ` tridge
2004-02-17 23:20 ` tridge
2004-02-17 23:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 3:26 ` tridge
2004-02-18 5:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-18 7:54 ` Marc Lehmann
2004-02-18 2:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-18 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 3:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-18 3:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 21:31 ` tridge
2004-02-18 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 22:50 ` tridge [this message]
2004-02-18 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 23:09 ` tridge
2004-02-18 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 8:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-19 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 16:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-19 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 18:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-19 19:48 ` Eureka! (was Re: UTF-8 and case-insensitivity) Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-19 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 20:05 ` viro
2004-02-19 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 20:45 ` viro
2004-02-19 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 21:43 ` viro
2004-02-19 21:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 22:21 ` David Lang
2004-02-19 20:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-19 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 0:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 0:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-02-20 0:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 0:57 ` tridge
2004-02-20 1:07 ` Paul Wagland
2004-02-20 13:31 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-20 0:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-23 10:13 ` Tim Connors
2004-02-20 1:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2004-02-20 12:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-19 23:37 ` tridge
2004-02-20 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 0:16 ` tridge
2004-02-20 0:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 1:26 ` tridge
2004-02-20 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-20 2:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-20 12:04 ` explicit dcache <-> user-space cache coherency, sys_mark_dir_clean(), O_CLEAN Ingo Molnar
2004-02-20 13:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-20 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-20 16:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 13:23 ` [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2004-02-20 18:00 ` viro
2004-02-20 15:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-20 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-20 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-21 1:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-21 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-21 8:04 ` viro
2004-02-21 17:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-21 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 8:26 ` Keith Owens
2004-02-23 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-23 13:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-23 16:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-23 17:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 23:00 ` tridge
2004-02-20 17:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 0:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-21 1:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 3:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 17:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-20 20:38 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-22 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-22 16:55 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 19:08 ` UTF-8 and case-insensitivity Helge Hafting
2004-02-18 4:08 ` tridge
2004-02-18 10:05 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-02-18 11:43 ` tridge
2004-02-18 12:31 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-02-18 16:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-18 20:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-19 2:53 ` Daniel Newby
2004-02-17 5:25 ` Tim Connors
2004-02-17 7:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-17 8:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-17 14:25 ` Dave Kleikamp
2004-02-18 0:16 ` Robert White
2004-02-18 0:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 1:03 ` Robert White
2004-02-18 21:48 ` Ville Herva
2004-02-18 2:48 ` tridge
2004-02-18 20:56 ` Robert White
[not found] <fa.epf5o9k.1rkudgo@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.idvvhjl.1jge92d@ifi.uio.no>
2004-02-18 1:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] <1q4Si-658-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1q7no-8ss-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qfb7-7s5-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qmPm-6Gl-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qpWI-1Sa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qqpO-2lx-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qqzv-2tr-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qqJc-2A2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qHAR-2Wm-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qIwr-5GB-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qIwr-5GB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qIQ1-5WR-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qIZt-6b9-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1qJsF-6Be-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-19 0:06 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-02-19 1:01 ` tridge
2004-02-19 1:08 ` Hua Zhong
2004-02-19 1:46 ` tridge
2004-02-19 2:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-19 3:20 ` tridge
2004-02-19 10:18 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-19 12:11 ` Paulo Marques
2004-02-19 19:04 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-19 14:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-19 20:12 ` Robert White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16435.60448.70856.791580@samba.org \
--to=tridge@samba.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox