public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Burke Libbey <burke.libbey@shopify.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: reset sched_entity depth on changing parent
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:18:42 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164441414171122@web11g.yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141024155805.GF21513@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>



24.10.2014, 19:58, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0400, Burke Libbey wrote:
>>  From 2014-02-15: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/15/217
>>
>>  This issue was reported and patched, but it still occurs in some situations on
>>  newer kernel versions.
>>
>>  [2249353.328452] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000150
>>  [2249353.336528] IP: [<ffffffff810b1cf7>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xe7/0x210
>>
>>  se.parent gets out of sync with se.depth, causing a panic when the algorithm in
>>  find_matching_se assumes they are correct. This patch forces se.depth to be
>>  updated every time se.parent is, so they can no longer become desync'd.
>>
>>  CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>>  CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>  Signed-off-by: Burke Libbey <burke.libbey@shopify.com>
>>  ---
>>
>>  I haven't been able to isolate the problem. Though I'm pretty confident this
>>  fixes the issue I've been having, I have not been able to prove it.
>
> So this isn't correct, switching rq should not change depth. I suspect
> you're just papering over the issue by frequently resetting the value,
> which simply narrows the race window.

Just a hypothesis.

I was seeking a places where task_group of a task may change. I can't understand
how changing of parent's cgroup during fork() applies to a child.

Child's cgroup is the same as parent's after dup_task_struct(). The only function
changing task_group is sched_move_task(), but we do not call it between
dup_task_struct() and wake_up_new_task(). Shouldn't we do something like this?

(compile tested only)
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cc18694..0ccbbdb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7833,6 +7833,11 @@ static void cpu_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
 	sched_offline_group(tg);
 }
 
+static void cpu_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	sched_move_task(task);
+}
+
 static int cpu_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
 				 struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
 {
@@ -8205,6 +8210,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpu_cgrp_subsys = {
 	.css_free	= cpu_cgroup_css_free,
 	.css_online	= cpu_cgroup_css_online,
 	.css_offline	= cpu_cgroup_css_offline,
+	.fork		= cpu_cgroup_fork,
 	.can_attach	= cpu_cgroup_can_attach,
 	.attach		= cpu_cgroup_attach,
 	.exit		= cpu_cgroup_exit,


Or we just should set tsk->sched_task_group?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-24 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-24 15:07 [PATCH] sched: reset sched_entity depth on changing parent Burke Libbey
2014-10-24 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-24 17:18   ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-10-27  9:49     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-27 12:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-27 12:40       ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-27 13:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-27 13:36           ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-27 13:45             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-27 13:48               ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-27 13:47           ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-27 13:48             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164441414171122@web11g.yandex.ru \
    --to=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=burke.libbey@shopify.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox