Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20

Guenter Roeck
2015-01-20T14:17:52Z

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:53:08PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150119:
>
> The omap tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
>
> The net-next tree lost its build failure.
>
> The mmc-uh tree gained a conflict against the sunxi tree.
>
> The audit tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3975
> 3828 files changed, 141642 insertions(+), 68217 deletions(-)
>
What difference a few days can make ... from zero failures to:

Build results:
total: 133 pass: 123 fail: 10
Failed builds:
i386:allyesconfig
mips:allmodconfig
powerpc:cell_defconfig (binutils 2.23)
powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig
powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
powerpc:cell_defconfig (binutils 2.24)
powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig
powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
sparc64:allmodconfig
x86_64:allyesconfig

Qemu tests:
total: 30 pass: 19 fail: 11
Failed tests:
microblaze:microblaze_defconfig
microblaze:microblazeel_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc_book3s_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig
sh:sh_defconfig
sparc32:sparc_defconfig
sparc32:sparc_smp_defconfig
x86:x86_pc_defconfig
x86_64:x86_64_pc_defconfig

Most of it mm related problems inherited from mmotm, but there are
a few others (sparc64, x86_64, and i386 don't fail to build on mmotm,
and the microblaze qemu test fails differently, for example).

Guenter