public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] md: protect md_thread with a new disk level spin lock
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:39:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16613534-5482-23c5-fa97-cfaedecab3d7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230315061810.653263-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>



On 3/15/23 14:18, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> Our test reports a uaf for 'mddev->sync_thread':
>
> T1                      T2
> md_start_sync
>   md_register_thread
> 			raid1d
> 			 md_check_recovery
> 			  md_reap_sync_thread
> 			   md_unregister_thread
> 			    kfree
>
>   md_wakeup_thread
>    wake_up
>    ->sync_thread was freed

Better to provide the relevant uaf (user after free perhaps you mean)
log from the test.

> Currently, a global spinlock 'pers_lock' is borrowed to protect
> 'mddev->thread', this problem can be fixed likewise, however, there might
> be similar problem for other md_thread, and I really don't like the idea to
> borrow a global lock.
>
> This patch use a disk level spinlock to protect md_thread in relevant apis.

It is array level I think, and you probably want to remove the comment.

* pers_lockdoes extra service to protect accesses to
* mddev->thread when the mutex cannot be held.

Thanks,
Guoqing

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15  6:18 [PATCH v2 0/5] md: fix uaf for sync_thread Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] md: pass a md_thread pointer to md_register_thread() Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] md: refactor md_wakeup_thread() Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] md: use md_thread api to wake up sync_thread Yu Kuai
2023-03-17  2:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-17  3:30     ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-18  2:31       ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] md: pass a mddev to md_unregister_thread() Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] md: protect md_thread with a new disk level spin lock Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  9:39   ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2023-03-15 10:02     ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 10:39       ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-03-15  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] md: fix uaf for sync_thread Paul Menzel
2023-03-15 22:55   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2023-03-16  1:26     ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-28 23:31       ` Song Liu
2023-03-29  1:14         ` Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16613534-5482-23c5-fa97-cfaedecab3d7@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox