From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Rework adv7511_power_on/off() so they can be reused internally
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1661379.b8y5I25JKx@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLVTP-ZcG1DL4LZZ884B=fQ6dH2JHy+2JMYe3Qr=ghSP+g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi John,
On Tuesday 22 Nov 2016 09:25:22 John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 21 Nov 2016 16:37:30 John Stultz wrote:
> @@ -545,24 +554,13 @@ static int adv7511_get_modes(struct adv7511 *adv7511,
> >> unsigned int count;
> >>
> >> /* Reading the EDID only works if the device is powered */
> >>
> >> - if (!adv7511->powered) {
> >> - regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
> >> - ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN, 0);
> >> - if (adv7511->i2c_main->irq) {
> >> - regmap_write(adv7511->regmap,
> >> ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(0),
> >> - ADV7511_INT0_EDID_READY);
> >> - regmap_write(adv7511->regmap,
> >> ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(1),
> >> - ADV7511_INT1_DDC_ERROR);
> >> - }
> >> - adv7511->current_edid_segment = -1;
> >> - }
> >> + if (!adv7511->powered)
> >> + __adv7511_power_on(adv7511);
> >
> > The __adv7511_power_on() function does more than the above, in particular
> > it performs an expensive regcache_sync() and calls adv7533_dsi_power_on()
> > for the ADV7533. Don't those operations have side effects that are either
> > not wanted or not needed here ? In any case this patch modifies the
> > behaviour of the driver, which needs to be documented in the kernel
> > message.
>
> So yes, while the adv7533 bits aren't needed in the internal function,
> I'm finding the logic to pulse the HPD and the regcache_sync call seem
> to be needed side effects, as without that logic, I get i2c_transfer()
> errors in adv7511_get_edid_block().
Does this patch fix the problem without requiring the 200ms delay ?
> I'll try to rework this patch to split the two changes of reworking
> the power_on/off function to be re-used (with no logic chage), and the
> patch to reuse it in get_modes() which resolves a bug.
Have you identified which register write fixes your problem here ?
> Thanks so much for the review!
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 0:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] adv7511 EDID probing improvements John Stultz
2016-11-22 0:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Rework adv7511_power_on/off() so they can be reused internally John Stultz
2016-11-22 8:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-22 8:16 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 8:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-22 17:25 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 17:38 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-11-22 17:44 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 19:46 ` John Stultz
2016-11-23 3:50 ` Archit Taneja
2016-11-28 18:44 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 0:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Add 200ms delay on power-on John Stultz
2016-11-22 8:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-22 17:38 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 18:07 ` John Stultz
2016-11-22 18:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-22 18:53 ` John Stultz
2016-11-23 7:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-11-25 0:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 6:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-11-22 0:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Enable HPD interrupts to support hotplug and improve monitor detection John Stultz
2016-11-22 8:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1661379.b8y5I25JKx@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox