public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, chenzhongjin@huawei.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] objtool: Add --mnop as an option to --mcount
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:26:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1663223588.wppdx3129x.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202209130240.GpGMxW7T-lkp@intel.com>

kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Sathvika,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/topic/ppc-kvm]
> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.0-rc5]
> [cannot apply to powerpc/next masahiroy-kbuild/for-next next-20220912]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sathvika-Vasireddy/objtool-Enable-and-implement-mcount-option-on-powerpc/20220912-163023
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git topic/ppc-kvm
> config: x86_64-rhel-8.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220913/202209130240.GpGMxW7T-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/ca5e2b42c0d4438ba93623579b6860b98f3598f3
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Sathvika-Vasireddy/objtool-Enable-and-implement-mcount-option-on-powerpc/20220912-163023
>         git checkout ca5e2b42c0d4438ba93623579b6860b98f3598f3
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

Thanks.

> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>>> cc1: error: '-mnop-mcount' is not implemented for '-fPIC'

CONFIG_NOP_MCOUNT is used for FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_CC, so instead of:

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index f9920f1341c8..a8dd138df637 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ config X86
        select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER_OFFSTACK      if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER
        select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
        select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT              if HAVE_OBJTOOL
+       select HAVE_NOP_MCOUNT                  if HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT
        select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
        select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
        select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS

I think you should do:

+       select HAVE_NOP_MCOUNT                  if FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_OBJTOOL


I was hoping we could reuse CONFIG_NOP_MCOUNT seeing as it is only used 
by s390, but I now wonder if it is better to just keep that separate. We 
could introduce HAVE_OBJTOOL_NOP_MCOUNT for objtool instead.


- Naveen

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-15  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-12  8:20 [PATCH v3 00/16] objtool: Enable and implement --mcount option on powerpc Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] powerpc: Fix __WARN_FLAGS() for use with Objtool Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] powerpc: Override __ALIGN and __ALIGN_STR macros Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-13 12:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-13 12:21     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-13 13:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] powerpc: Fix objtool unannotated intra-function call warnings Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] powerpc: Curb objtool unannotated intra-function warnings Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc: Skip objtool from running on drivers/crypto/vmx/aesp8-ppc.o Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] powerpc: Fix objtool unannotated intra-function call warnings on PPC32 Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] powerpc: Skip objtool from running on VDSO files Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] objtool: Fix SEGFAULT Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] objtool: Use target file endianness instead of a compiled constant Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] objtool: Use target file class size " Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] objtool: Add --mnop as an option to --mcount Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12 18:55   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-15  6:56     ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2022-09-17 19:12   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-28  0:48   ` [objtool] ca5e2b42c0: kernel_BUG_at_arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c kernel test robot
2022-09-28 15:44     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-28 19:13       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-09-28 20:45         ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] objtool: Read special sections with alts only when specific options are selected Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] objtool: Use macros to define arch specific reloc types Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] objtool: Add arch specific function arch_ftrace_match() Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] objtool/powerpc: Enable objtool to be built on ppc Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-12  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] objtool/powerpc: Add --mcount specific implementation Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-09-13 10:00   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-13 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] objtool: Enable and implement --mcount option on powerpc Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-14  0:15   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-09-21  9:10     ` Sathvika Vasireddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1663223588.wppdx3129x.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox