From: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:51:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com> (raw)
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, at 03:18AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>Peter W�chtler <pwaechtler@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> While it's more secure to not dump core at all if the program has
>> switched euid, it's also very unpractical. Since only programs
>> started from root, being setuid root or have CAP_SETUID it's far
>> more practical to dump as root.root mode 600. This is the bahavior
>> of Solaris.
>>
>> The current implementation does not ensure that an existing core
>> file is only readable as root, i.e. after dumping the ownership
>> and mode is unchanged.
>>
>> Besides mm->dumpable to avoid recursive core dumps, on setuid files
>> the dumpable flag still prevents a core dump while seteuid & co will
>> result in a core only readable as root.
>
>It's a bit sad to add another function call level to sys_unlink() simply
>because the core dumping code needs it.
>
>Is it not possible to call sys_unlink() directly from there? Something like
>
>long kernel_unlink(const char *name)
>{
> mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> long ret;
>
> set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> ret = sys_unlink(name);
> set_fs(old_fs);
> return ret;
>}
And you're asking me? ;)
While getname() has a check for user/kernelspace - do you really
care about "the overhead" for a function call level with 1 argument?
Uhm, probably if you even care to write this..
What is the cost for switching the segments?
But I agree that sys_unlink should be the fast call and dumping core
is the exception :)
would fastcall do_unlink() help? I guess the arg is then passed in a
register
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-22 8:51 Peter Waechtler [this message]
2004-04-22 8:55 ` [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 15:35 Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 17:22 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 7:46 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 7:16 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 17:10 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-23 19:05 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 7:14 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 9:40 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 19:43 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 19:53 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-22 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-21 19:20 Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com \
--to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox