public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:51:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com> (raw)

 
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, at 03:18AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

>Peter W�chtler <pwaechtler@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> While it's more secure to not dump core at all if the program has
>>  switched euid, it's also very unpractical. Since only programs 
>>  started from root, being setuid root or have CAP_SETUID it's far 
>>  more practical to dump as root.root mode 600. This is the bahavior 
>>  of Solaris.
>> 
>>  The current implementation does not ensure that an existing core
>>  file is only readable as root, i.e. after dumping the ownership 
>>  and mode is unchanged.
>> 
>>  Besides mm->dumpable to avoid recursive core dumps, on setuid files 
>>  the dumpable flag still prevents a core dump while seteuid & co will
>>  result in a core only readable as root.
>
>It's a bit sad to add another function call level to sys_unlink() simply
>because the core dumping code needs it.
>
>Is it not possible to call sys_unlink() directly from there?  Something like
>
>long kernel_unlink(const char *name)
>{
>	mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
>	long ret;
>
>	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
>	ret = sys_unlink(name);
>	set_fs(old_fs);
>	return ret;
>}	

And you're asking me? ;)
While getname() has a check for user/kernelspace - do you really
care about "the overhead" for a function call level with 1 argument?
Uhm, probably if you even care to write this..

What is the cost for switching the segments?
But I agree that sys_unlink should be the fast call and dumping core
is the exception :)

would fastcall do_unlink() help? I guess the arg is then passed in a
register



             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22  8:51 Peter Waechtler [this message]
2004-04-22  8:55 ` [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 15:35 Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 17:22   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23  7:46 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23  7:16 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 17:10 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-23 19:05   ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23  7:14 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22  9:40 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22  9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 19:43   ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 19:53     ` Chris Wright
2004-04-22 20:05     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-21 19:20 Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22  1:18 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com \
    --to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox