From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:47:11 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1665542284.336646.1611820031174.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6cb6eb10bbb48989d3a9e087951e50e@intel.com>
Tomas,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> >> Can you please explain a little more what devices are involved?
>> >> Does it implement _get_device() and _put_device()?
>> > No this is not connected to those handlers of the underlying device
>> > and those won't help.
>> > I have a spi device provided by MFD framework so it can go away anytime.
>>
>> Can it go away physically or just in software?
> Software, but since this is mfd it's basically hotplug. The kernel is crashing
> when I simulate hardware failure.
>>
>> Usually the pattern is that you make sure in the device driver that nobody can
>> orphan the MTD while it is in use.
>> e.g. drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.c does so. In _get_device() it grabs a reference on
>> the underlying UBI volume to make sure it cannot go away while the MTD (on
>> top of UBI) is in use.
>
> I can try that if it helps, because we are simulating possible lower level
> crash.
> In an case I believe that the proper refcouting is much more robust solution,
> than the current one.
> I'd appreciate if someone can review the actual implementation.
This happens right now, I try to understand why exactly the current way is not
good in enough. :-)
Your approach makes sure that the MTD itself does not go away while it has users but
how does this help in the case where the underlying MFD just vanishes?
The MTD can be in use and the MFD can go away while e.g. mtd_read() or such
takes place.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 20:03 [PATCH] mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption Tomas Winkler
2021-01-27 20:46 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-01-27 20:55 ` Winkler, Tomas
2021-01-27 21:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-01-28 6:33 ` Winkler, Tomas
2021-01-28 7:47 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2021-01-28 8:53 ` Winkler, Tomas
2021-01-28 9:00 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-28 17:57 ` Winkler, Tomas
2021-01-28 20:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-02-13 17:09 ` Winkler, Tomas
2021-02-15 13:43 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1665542284.336646.1611820031174.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox