From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758558AbZGGPpZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:45:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757373AbZGGPpP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:45:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:51208 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756277AbZGGPpO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:45:14 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1246976551.3613.33.camel@ht.satnam> References: <1246976551.3613.33.camel@ht.satnam> <1246975428.3613.10.camel@ht.satnam> To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, trivial , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] trivial: fix typo "that that" in multiple files Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:37:14 +0100 Message-ID: <16660.1246981034@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > - three states, we know that that CPU has exited any previous RCU > + three states, we know that CPU has exited any previous RCU That's probably wrong. Look at it as "we know that _that_ CPU". > -likely that that process will submit another request soon, and that > +likely that process will submit another request soon, and that Ditto. Most people would actually say two 'that' words here, and the emphasis goes on the second one. > -caches are expected to be coherent, there's no guarantee that that coherency > +caches are expected to be coherent, there's no guarantee that coherency NAK. This is correct before. This doesn't make any sense with the second 'that' removed. > - 1), and 3 means that that the strategy is always enabled. > + 1), and 3 means that the strategy is always enabled. This is probably correct. The second 'that' or the 'the' is wrong because both the second 'that' and the 'the' are trying to specify the strategy. > -Here we see that that we had a latency of 12 microsecs (which is > +Here we see that we had a latency of 12 microsecs (which is Correct. > ... Various of the remainder are incorrect. David