public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: linux-2.6.5-mjb1 Comment.
  2004-04-15  8:31 linux-2.6.5-mjb1 Comment haiquy
@ 2004-04-14 23:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin J. Bligh @ 2004-04-14 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: haiquy, linux-kernel

> Test 2.6.5-mjb2 for more than 2 days only, system is pretty stable (the same as
> almost all other 2.6.x with my box). The significant performance improved
> compared to 2.6.5-aa5, 2.6.5 and all others 2.6.x for with a low end box line mine
> (660 Mhx Celeron 256 Mb RAM) make me write this comment. :-) Wish that some
> improvement could make way to the mainline kernel.

Good ;-) We're working on getting it integrated back in ... just a couple of
outstanding corner cases need killing first.
 
> The memory management is nearly perfect. Before I tried one ck kernel use auto
> regulation swap and it was still much worse than this one as I noticed the value
> in swappiness also changes by the time.

Con's changes are in there, but they were updated once or twice, and there
are bug fixes too. I still think it's the Right Thing to Do (tm).

M.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-2.6.5-mjb1 Comment.
@ 2004-04-15  8:31 haiquy
  2004-04-14 23:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: haiquy @ 2004-04-15  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel


Hi,

Test 2.6.5-mjb2 for more than 2 days only, system is pretty stable (the same as
almost all other 2.6.x with my box). The significant performance improved
compared to 2.6.5-aa5, 2.6.5 and all others 2.6.x for with a low end box line mine
(660 Mhx Celeron 256 Mb RAM) make me write this comment. :-) Wish that some
improvement could make way to the mainline kernel.

The memory management is nearly perfect. Before I tried one ck kernel use auto
regulation swap and it was still much worse than this one as I noticed the value
in swappiness also changes by the time.

Here is one of the usage senario with my box: Running
1. Netbean-3.6-rc1
2. Tomcat 5.0.19
3. A dictionary server written in Java (my work)
4. Mozilla to test local Tomcat
5. 3 terminals, one centericq, one pine
6. Icewm

6. bash-2.05b$ free
		total       used       free     shared    buffers      cached
   Mem:        255240     252376       2864          0       7924      89532
  -/+ buffers/cache:     154920     100320
  Swap:       256960       3996     252964

Compared to all other 2.6.x and 2.4.x the swap usages for the same is about 30Mb
and if I do lots of compiling jsp pages, it increased to nearly 128Mb swap and
system became rather slugish. With 2.6.5-mjb2 the maximum swap usage I noticed is
30Mb and system response is quite good.

Thank you for doing a good job so I can still keep my old box for working :-)

Steve Kieu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-14 23:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-15  8:31 linux-2.6.5-mjb1 Comment haiquy
2004-04-14 23:45 ` Martin J. Bligh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox