* [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
@ 2025-06-19 12:09 Abinash Singh
2025-06-24 14:16 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-06-19 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
Cc: jaegeuk, chao, linux-kernel, Abinash Singh,
syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()` and
`__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three fields
(`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the remaining fields
uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior when those fields are accessed
later, especially during extent merging.
Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
v2 : Corrected Author name
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
struct extent_tree *et;
struct extent_node *en;
- struct extent_info ei;
+ struct extent_info ei = {0};
if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
/* drop largest read extent */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
2025-06-19 12:09 [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage Abinash Singh
@ 2025-06-24 14:16 ` Chao Yu
2025-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Abinash Singh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2025-06-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh, linux-f2fs-devel
Cc: chao, jaegeuk, linux-kernel, Abinash Singh,
syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
On 2025/6/19 20:09, Abinash Singh wrote:
> KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()` and
> `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
>
> The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three fields
> (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the remaining fields
> uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior when those fields are accessed
> later, especially during extent merging.
>
> Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
>
It needs to add a fixes line, otherwise, it looks good to me.
Thanks,
> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> v2 : Corrected Author name
> ---
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
> struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
> struct extent_tree *et;
> struct extent_node *en;
> - struct extent_info ei;
> + struct extent_info ei = {0};
>
> if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
> /* drop largest read extent */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
2025-06-24 14:16 ` Chao Yu
@ 2025-06-24 17:09 ` Abinash Singh
2025-06-25 2:19 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-06-24 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
Cc: abinashlalotra, abinashsinghlalotra, chao, jaegeuk, linux-kernel,
syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()`
and `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three
fields (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the
remaining fields uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior
when those fields are accessed later, especially during
extent merging.
Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
Fixes: a28ef1f5aebe ("f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file")
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
v3 : Added Fixes and Closes tags
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
struct extent_tree *et;
struct extent_node *en;
- struct extent_info ei;
+ struct extent_info ei = {0};
if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
/* drop largest read extent */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
2025-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Abinash Singh
@ 2025-06-25 2:19 ` Chao Yu
2025-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v4] " Abinash Singh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2025-06-25 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh, linux-f2fs-devel
Cc: chao, abinashsinghlalotra, jaegeuk, linux-kernel,
syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
On 6/25/25 01:09, Abinash Singh wrote:
> KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()`
> and `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
>
> The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three
> fields (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the
> remaining fields uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior
> when those fields are accessed later, especially during
> extent merging.
>
> Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
> Fixes: a28ef1f5aebe ("f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file")
Should use this instead?
Fixes: 94afd6d6e525 ("f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3 : Added Fixes and Closes tags
> ---
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
> struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
> struct extent_tree *et;
> struct extent_node *en;
> - struct extent_info ei;
> + struct extent_info ei = {0};
>
> if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
> /* drop largest read extent */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
2025-06-25 2:19 ` Chao Yu
@ 2025-06-25 11:05 ` Abinash Singh
2025-07-09 18:10 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-06-25 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chao
Cc: abinashlalotra, abinashsinghlalotra, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel,
linux-kernel, syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()`
and `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three
fields (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the
remaining fields uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior
when those fields are accessed later, especially during
extent merging.
Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
Fixes: 94afd6d6e525 ("f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
v4 : Added Reviewed-by and Corrected Fixes
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
struct extent_tree *et;
struct extent_node *en;
- struct extent_info ei;
+ struct extent_info ei = {0};
if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
/* drop largest read extent */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
2025-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v4] " Abinash Singh
@ 2025-07-09 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs @ 2025-07-09 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh
Cc: chao, syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4, abinashsinghlalotra,
linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, jaegeuk
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:35:37 +0530 you wrote:
> KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()`
> and `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
>
> The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three
> fields (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the
> remaining fields uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior
> when those fields are accessed later, especially during
> extent merging.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev,v4] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/154467f4ad03
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-09 18:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-19 12:09 [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage Abinash Singh
2025-06-24 14:16 ` Chao Yu
2025-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Abinash Singh
2025-06-25 2:19 ` Chao Yu
2025-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v4] " Abinash Singh
2025-07-09 18:10 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).